Seriously Panini??

[jbarnett83]

Surprised I haven’t seen this brought up about the new Prizm. Notice anything similar?

2015/16

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2015-16-Panini-Prizm-Basketball-246-Steve-Nash-Phoenix-Suns/361968551284?hash=item544701c574

2018/19

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2018-19-Panini-Prizm-Base-155-Steve-Nash/253993701490?hash=item3b23345072:g:nvQAAOSw~flb9hPB

Steve Nash has been rarely seen in any recent products so for Panini to do this is ridiculous

[mondogenerator]

they just mail it in on the regular.

as a PC collector, that's such a kick in the balls.

[Oldschool42]

No excuse for that. It would have cool if they had used a rookie year shot. I think vet cards should be as old school, photo wise, as possible.

[LC2nine10]

https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1220483
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1083008

It's really bad in baseball.

[clipperboy24]

Surprised I haven’t seen this brought up about the new Prizm. Notice anything similar?

2015/16

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2015-16-Panini-Prizm-Basketball-246-Steve-Nash-Phoenix-Suns/361968551284?hash=item544701c574

2018/19

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2018-19-Panini-Prizm-Base-155-Steve-Nash/253993701490?hash=item3b23345072:g:nvQAAOSw~flb9hPB

Steve Nash has been rarely seen in any recent products so for Panini to do this is ridiculous

Now that’s funny!

At least you can’t knock them for not using a cool action shot ����

[pingbling23]

this has been going on for decades from all brands. i believe there is information in an old thread as to contract information and why card makers have to do this.

[splum]

Surprised I haven’t seen this brought up about the new Prizm. Notice anything similar?


It's extremely well worn territory.

[dasiegel]

wow that is wack

[theLUCKYshow]

Uggghhh

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Jasondr91]

See Artis Gilmore & Bernard King

[WalterAZ31]

different companies using same photo I can sorta understand

same company using same exact photo for 2 base cards in separate years is inexcusable. theres literally no reason for the card to exist

[Ferg1945]

See Artis Gilmore & Bernard King

Horace Grant

[jbarnett83]

different companies using same photo I can sorta understand

same company using same exact photo for 2 base cards in separate years is inexcusable. theres literally no reason for the card to exist

Even worse that they are both from the same product (Prizm)