Rhyno_24
09-12-2013, 08:01 PM
Hey guys! I just wanted some feedback to see if there is anything I can do in regards to an item not as described case. From what I have read on here, Ebay always sides with the buyer and I am expecting nothing different here, but just wanted to hear your thoughts in regards to the situation.
I sold my Topps Chrome David Wilson Red Refractor Auto for $499.99 buy it now last week. Card was delivered on Friday and I sent with signature confirmation. Monday rolls around and I get a notification from Ebay that a case has been opened against me in regards to this card. I have included the link for you to view.
I have only sent 3 cards off for grading in my life, so I am definitely not an expert, but the card I sold was at least NRMT or better. Do you guys think I am in the wrong or is the buyer just having buyer's remorse after Wilson's pathetic game? I have included the conversation through the case for readings as well.
Sorry for the long read, but I would like some honest opinions.
Thanks, Ryan
2012 Topps Chrome David Wilson Red Refractor RC Auto Giants Ed 3 5 | eBay (http://www.ebay.com/itm/380709854946?ssPageName=STRK:MESOX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1561.l2649)
Buyer - "Card condition isn't nrmt - mint... Corners, edges, and surface have flaws. I would like a full refund."
My reply - "The card purchased by the buyer was in at least NRMT (near mint) condition or better as stated in the item description. If the particular card in question was sent to BGS (Beckett Grading Services) for grading, the card would grade a 7 or better which is considered near mint."
Buyer - "I would like to return for a refund as the card doesn't meet that condition in my eyes. I see that returns are accepted and I will ship out tomorrow."
My reply - "I do accept returns under certain circumstances. In this case, I know for sure that the card itself meets the criteria in my description. Also, I noticed the package was delivered on Friday, September 6th, in which it needed to be signed for as I sent with signature confirmation. I find it a coincidence that you waited to file the claim on Monday, September 9th after David Wilson had a very disappointing game and since then, the prices of his cards have fallen. I see this being a case of buyer remorse and not an issue with the card itself. "
Buyer - "Item was opened on Monday. I send all cards in for grading and the condition of the card isn't what I expected based off the listing. The card has been mailed back to the seller and due to his listing policy (returns accepted), I expect a full refund."
My reply - "Ok, so the buyer sends all cards off for grading. Most collector's send cards off to BGS (Beckett Grading Services) in hopes of getting a high grade on a card to increase the value. Most collector's are hoping to receive a grade of 9.5 or higher which is considered gem mint. As stated before, the description of the card in question states the card is in NRMT or near mint or better condition. And as stated before, the card certainly meets all of the criteria in the description as being near mint or better. I understand the buyer's feelings that the card is not in the condition "he/she wants", but there is nothing in my description that states the card is mint or gem mint. I imagine Ebay will side with the buyer, which I do not agree with in this situation. Once Ebay has decided the case, I will acknowledge and abide to there ruling."
I sold my Topps Chrome David Wilson Red Refractor Auto for $499.99 buy it now last week. Card was delivered on Friday and I sent with signature confirmation. Monday rolls around and I get a notification from Ebay that a case has been opened against me in regards to this card. I have included the link for you to view.
I have only sent 3 cards off for grading in my life, so I am definitely not an expert, but the card I sold was at least NRMT or better. Do you guys think I am in the wrong or is the buyer just having buyer's remorse after Wilson's pathetic game? I have included the conversation through the case for readings as well.
Sorry for the long read, but I would like some honest opinions.
Thanks, Ryan
2012 Topps Chrome David Wilson Red Refractor RC Auto Giants Ed 3 5 | eBay (http://www.ebay.com/itm/380709854946?ssPageName=STRK:MESOX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1561.l2649)
Buyer - "Card condition isn't nrmt - mint... Corners, edges, and surface have flaws. I would like a full refund."
My reply - "The card purchased by the buyer was in at least NRMT (near mint) condition or better as stated in the item description. If the particular card in question was sent to BGS (Beckett Grading Services) for grading, the card would grade a 7 or better which is considered near mint."
Buyer - "I would like to return for a refund as the card doesn't meet that condition in my eyes. I see that returns are accepted and I will ship out tomorrow."
My reply - "I do accept returns under certain circumstances. In this case, I know for sure that the card itself meets the criteria in my description. Also, I noticed the package was delivered on Friday, September 6th, in which it needed to be signed for as I sent with signature confirmation. I find it a coincidence that you waited to file the claim on Monday, September 9th after David Wilson had a very disappointing game and since then, the prices of his cards have fallen. I see this being a case of buyer remorse and not an issue with the card itself. "
Buyer - "Item was opened on Monday. I send all cards in for grading and the condition of the card isn't what I expected based off the listing. The card has been mailed back to the seller and due to his listing policy (returns accepted), I expect a full refund."
My reply - "Ok, so the buyer sends all cards off for grading. Most collector's send cards off to BGS (Beckett Grading Services) in hopes of getting a high grade on a card to increase the value. Most collector's are hoping to receive a grade of 9.5 or higher which is considered gem mint. As stated before, the description of the card in question states the card is in NRMT or near mint or better condition. And as stated before, the card certainly meets all of the criteria in the description as being near mint or better. I understand the buyer's feelings that the card is not in the condition "he/she wants", but there is nothing in my description that states the card is mint or gem mint. I imagine Ebay will side with the buyer, which I do not agree with in this situation. Once Ebay has decided the case, I will acknowledge and abide to there ruling."