BGS Resubmit question

[frozenntimesports]

My last BGS order went well (20 for 23 BGS 9.5+)

I got one back that I thought was a candidate for a 10. It came back not reaching the 9.5 grade.

Have you ever resubmitted the same card and got a 9.5 the second time around? I really think they missed the mark on this one. The other two I put under the scope and saw what they saw, but this one I can't find the flaw.

I'm thinking about sticking it in with my next order and seeing what happens.

Has anyone ever had success with this. It is a gold auto #'d to 50.

[jewcer2k5]

Sure is worth it. Problem if you ask for a minimum is you don't know what they hit you on :/.

PM me if you wanna discuss.

[dthimesch]

crack and retry.

Im my last submission I did, I had 3 cards not meet a 9.5 min.

Re subbed them and 2 got a 9.5 and 1 a 10.

Take that in for a second. 1 of them did not meet a 9.5 min and then got a 10.

[cowboyzqna]

Would think that the graders might get a little fatigued at some point... So I can understand some harsh or on the other end of The spectrum lenient grades.
I've have success with resubs in the past so I would say crack it and try try again.

Good luck :)

[Afton9444]

Check the surface on the back.. that is usually were people miss the flaw. people inspect the front like crazy and the back usually gets a quick scan. If the card looks flawless and you don't see anything obvious resubmit it with out the minimum and good chance you have a 9.5 if not you will know exactly what it was.

[frozenntimesports]

Would think that the graders might get a little fatigued at some point... So I can understand some harsh or on the other end of The spectrum lenient grades.

I'm not mad at anyone, I get that no one is perfect. I've gotten cards back and realized right away why they didn't grade as well as I thought they would.

This isn't the case here.


Check the surface on the back.. that is usually were people miss the flaw. people inspect the front like crazy and the back usually gets a quick scan. If the card looks flawless and you don't see anything obvious resubmit it with out the minimum and good chance you have a 9.5 if not you will know exactly what it was.

I did that and I put every card under a 20x microscope (I'm friends with some science guys) and there wasn't anything I could see.

I'm chalking it up to human error and giving it another shot.