View Full Version : J. Charles or B. jackson
ddmac
09-22-2010, 08:07 AM
for week 3
J. charles vs. 49ers
B. Jackson vs. bears
I'm afraid to go with J. charles because the 49ers are going to try to do their best to win and he is handcuffed with T. jones
B. jackson is going vs. the bears which right now have the best rush defense but the Green bay offense is so good espicially the passing game that it could open up the run.
I'm not sure which guy to go with.
iluvfish2
09-22-2010, 08:10 AM
I'd be leaning towards Jackson. He'll get the touches, and should get some recieving yards as well. As long as Willis is playing, I'm not a fan of anyone going against the 49ers Run D.
ddmac
09-22-2010, 08:20 AM
Another question
first
I have both M. Floyd and L. Nanne and i'm wondering which one to start M. floyd will get more coverage, but he is a deep threat, while Nanne is more of a second option in chargers, but the predictions are more points for Nanne.
Second
Should i put L. evans in for M. floyd
L. Evans is going against a really bad Patriots Defense, but his quarterback is Ryan Fitzpatrick.
M. Floyd had a good game last week but they are going agaisnt seattle which has good corners, but agian they let denver walk all over them in the passing game.
Not sure if I should keep M. Floyd or sub him with either L. nanne or L. Evans
iluvfish2
09-22-2010, 08:25 AM
Hard to play anyone on the Bills to be honest. But new QB could change things, but in all honesty, if it was me, I'm not risking it.
Chargers will throw, but right now looks like Gates is the main red zone target (yeah me), but it only takes one bad coverage and its a td. I think I'd opt for Nanne, but Floyd could be a solid consideration as well. Guess a lot depends on if the Charges stick with the ground game this week or not. Mathews being hurt helps their recievers, but Tolbert and Sproles are a solid 1-2 combo, so I dont expect the running game to be hurt to much.
ddmac
09-22-2010, 08:44 AM
whats your reason to opt for Nanne?
ddmac
09-22-2010, 09:19 AM
Who is worth more in the long run M. Wallace or M. clayton
M. Wallace is doing below expectations he has just 87 yrds in two weeks if big Ben comes back will his value go up?
M. Clayton he has started the year really great, but will his production continue i don't know.
Overall which player is worth more. Should i let go of Wallace and put in Clayton or should i keep Wallace.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.