Industry Summit 2015
 

Panini announced:

Flawless will have triple autos and triple gem cards

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAVHAz9UsAASZfG.jpg[/IMG]

Flawless Kentucky Baskteball

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAVHCQhUsAAPhq4.jpg[/IMG]

Immaculate will have more game used shoes from new players

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAVEwsqVEAAoDKA.jpg[/IMG]

NT will be given an overhaul

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAVGOYzUMAAaNlG.jpg[/IMG]

Acquired Chinese New year worn jerseys (GS and Houston)

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAVERPMUYAA_p1J.jpg[/IMG]

Interesting!!!

even though ill probably never pull or own a chinese gu card, i was hoping they would have that in. i swear i cant tell at all who that player is on the triple auto card, im not exactly sure of the design on that one. the pic for the 'overhaul' on nt, it looks exactly the same as every other year with plain single jerseys ;)

That's a hell of an overhaul to National Treasures. :rolleyes:

I don't understand the logic of having the same player sign the same card multiple times....:confused:

Thanks for the cool Update!!

The triple auto was. Just prorotype

Looks like team USA in the making...

Sole of the game is interesting

NT OVERHAUL? Looks like the same crap

[QUOTE=GoldenBoy23;8931628]The triple auto was. Just prorotype

Looks like team USA in the making...

Sole of the game is interesting[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the clarification.

What's really going to be interesting is to see how much these high-end Wiggins cards are going to sell for.

Those shoes look like they'll be the first Wiggins Game Used release.

[QUOTE=inopethflames;8931513]even though ill probably never pull or own a chinese gu card, i was hoping they would have that in. i swear i cant tell at all who that player is on the triple auto card, im not exactly sure of the design on that one. the pic for the 'overhaul' on nt, it looks exactly the same as every other year with plain single jerseys ;)[/QUOTE]

It looks like kyrie steph rose, but i cant be 100% sure

No love for those of us that aren't into high rolling packs?

just like the other threads on the high end/high dollar stuff. to me, it just all looks the same. again, this is not a panini bashing, but there is no difference to me between a John Wall auto in flawless/NT than one from his RC year. And if the RC is considered a RC, Jwall RC autos from low end (tcert) sell for example 35-39, then why is something in a future release selling for much more.

when i see the above, i just see a card industry that is changing for the benefit of high spenders and group breaks. sorry i am repeating things again and again that others have mentioned.

Nice loving the shoe cards...
NT is fine...

Just going off my Twitter feed during the Panini presentation it seemed like Panini's solution to everything was more Flawless lol.

[QUOTE=Lee42;8931284]Panini announced:

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAVHAz9UsAASZfG.jpg[/IMG]

[/QUOTE]

I know this is a mock-up, but is that Derrick Rose?!? I know very few would care, but I definitely do! (Obviously not his sig, but some random photoshop sig), but that looks like Rose to me.

So no word on this Optimus product, I would have thought that if it existed they would have announced it during their big conference.

Triple autos don't appeal but they can pair college and pro photos which is nice.

Meh, same old same old

[QUOTE=Brobocop;8932293]So no word on this Optimus product, I would have thought that if it existed they would have announced it during their big conference.[/QUOTE]

I'm guessing they'll keep it secret until the last moment. No sense in taking away excitement or money from Flawless and Immaculate. The initial announcement of Flawless happened about the same way.

[QUOTE=Kingofkings1281;8932612]I'm guessing they'll keep it secret until the last moment. No sense in taking away excitement or money from Flawless and Immaculate. The initial announcement of Flawless happened about the same way.[/QUOTE]

Interesting, you could be right. When does the Industry Summit wrap up?

I hate these triple autos signed in random places. It looks like IP garbage.

[QUOTE=TungTLe;8932214]I know this is a mock-up, but is that Derrick Rose?!? I know very few would care, but I definitely do! (Obviously not his sig, but some random photoshop sig), but that looks like Rose to me.[/QUOTE]

Yes. Irving, Curry, Rose. No idea whos signature that is though.

[QUOTE=UltimateDeron;8932891]Yes. Irving, Curry, Rose. No idea whos signature that is though.[/QUOTE]


Geno Smith?

The cards look the exact same as this year with just a different picture.
[IMG]http://i57.tinypic.com/28koxuu.png[/IMG]

Why the heck not put the autos of the players? I mean how the hell can you mess up a mockup that bad?

[QUOTE=afrobandit;8932951]Geno Smith?[/QUOTE]

Oh my Lord.. You're right.

How lazy can Panini be to use a football players signature for a presentation as big and important as this?

[QUOTE=UltimateDeron;8933016]Oh my Lord.. You're right.

How lazy can Panini be to use a football players signature for a presentation as big and important as this?[/QUOTE]

Take five minutes and look at every product they release in all sports and you will know the answer to your question. It's panini proving once again they don't give a crap about any collectors because they know their money has everyone by the balls

[QUOTE=SethMurphy;8933044]Take five minutes and look at every product they release in all sports and you will know the answer to your question. It's panini proving once again they don't give a crap about any collectors because they know their money has everyone by the balls[/QUOTE]

I would love to hear the Panini defenders cover this one. :coffee:

It's partly the NBA's, NFL's, and any other organizations fault that continues to allow this poorly run monopoly to continue. Some of their products have been nice, but in large part they have become complacent in the way they approach the business and the way they serve their customers.

[QUOTE=UltimateDeron;8932891]Yes. Irving, Curry, Rose. No idea whos signature that is though.[/QUOTE]

I think its Rose, Kyrie and Russ

[QUOTE=440shane;8933188]I think its Rose, Kyrie and Russ[/QUOTE]

I'm totally confused.

Russ wore #7 and didn't play when they wore those jerseys. Curry wore #4 and the middle person doesn't look like they have on #4. Looks like #8 honestly, and that would be Rudy Gay, but it doesn't look like Rudy. The face kind of looks like Rose, but why would they have Kyrie, Rose, and Rose?

[QUOTE=UltimateDeron;8933236]I'm totally confused.

Russ wore #7 and didn't play when they wore those jerseys. Curry wore #4 and the middle person doesn't look like they have on #4. Looks like #8 honestly, and that would be Rudy Gay, but it doesn't look like Rudy. The face kind of looks like Rose, but why would they have Kyrie, Rose, and Rose?[/QUOTE]

Looks like that image is a last second mock up before the presentation. If you're looking for any kind of logic behind it, you won't find any.

[QUOTE=Wings;8933280]Looks like that image is a last second mock up before the presentation. If you're looking for any kind of logic behind it, you won't find any.[/QUOTE]

LOL Thanks :)!

If not OP, I thought all cards come from the same product. Same white color.

[QUOTE=Tarheelsfan2012;8932988]The cards look the exact same as this year with just a different picture.
[IMG]http://i57.tinypic.com/28koxuu.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]

This is the same preview they showed last year.. same player pictures as well. so i do not think this is the preview for the new Flawless.

I have a question for the collectors on here. It seems like dual and triple autograph cards seem to generally not have a very good premium over a single autograph card. I'd attribute this to the fact that a PC buyer would rather have a single autograph of their player rather than have a card in their collection that is sharing space with someone else. I guess my question is by Panini introducing these into Flawless, couldn't that possibly be seen as a drawback rather than an addition?

[QUOTE=Brobocop;8934009]I have a question for the collectors on here. It seems like dual and triple autograph cards seem to generally not have a very good premium over a single autograph card. I'd attribute this to the fact that a PC buyer would rather have a single autograph of their player rather than have a card in their collection that is sharing space with someone else. I guess my question is by Panini introducing these into Flawless, couldn't that possibly be seen as a drawback rather than an addition?[/QUOTE]

At least players of the same team in the same card :)!. But from different teams has no appeal to me... :coffee: