What is Julio Jones' Best True RC?
 

No Contenders or NT...whats his best true rc card then? Most expensive seems to be the SPA. Thoughts?

"best" ? or "Most Expensive" ?

I would say Topps or Topps Chrome

inception or spa imo

Topps finest is my vote. Nice on card in falcons uni
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x231/hockeyplayer2044/6353DCA2-F3CA-4B9E-B039-4F6A7CEDFA61-1305-00000424B8DD9559.jpg[/IMG]

It's NT....

If he ever signs them....

[QUOTE=BoxBreaker72;3301664]It's NT....

If he ever signs them....[/QUOTE]

doubtful...

Id say Topps finest as well. I had a few and wish I had kept atleast 1 of them but I didnt

Finest Logo RPA went for $250 BIN. So I would say Finest.

Kevin

So do we really think he isn't going to sign his NTs?

Sure hope he does cause he could use a nice sexy high end rook

Topps Chrome Auto probably.

I like the Absolute RPA. Closest thing to an NT if he never signs them.

[IMG]http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc442/PDawson21/VHTG-Basketball-Football/KGrHqJnwE9elp87DHBPoEmkJUPg60_57.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=PDawson21;3301781]Topps Chrome Auto probably.

I like the Absolute RPA. Closest thing to an NT if he never signs them.

[IMG]http://i1212.photobucket.com/albums/cc442/PDawson21/VHTG-Basketball-Football/KGrHqJnwE9elp87DHBPoEmkJUPg60_57.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

thats sexy!

The Finest isnt a TRUE RC.

Do you want the Actull Beckett Tabbed RC or just one that is considered a Rookie to most?

[QUOTE=Soxrule111;3301956]The Finest isnt a TRUE RC.

Do you want the Actull Beckett Tabbed RC or just one that is considered a Rookie to most?[/QUOTE]

Why isn't finest considered a true RC auto it's the same as a chrome?

[QUOTE=Soxrule111;3301956]The Finest isnt a TRUE RC.

Do you want the Actull [B]Beckett Tabbed [/B]RC or just one that is considered a Rookie to most?[/QUOTE]

You're joking right?

I'll never understand the "true rookie card" theory.
The majority of collectors consider all products that released during that year as a rookie card.

[QUOTE=Soxrule111;3301956]The Finest isnt a TRUE RC.

Do you want the Actull Beckett Tabbed RC or just one that is considered a Rookie to most?[/QUOTE]

How isnt it? It has the RC symbol on it....

[QUOTE=MI Rob;3301983]I'll never understand the "true rookie card" theory.
The majority of collectors consider all products that released during that year as a rookie card.[/QUOTE]

me neither. i think it's one of the dumbest arguments in the hobby.

I would go with these if he does not sign NT or EXQUISITE. Out of /299 and on-card

[IMG]http://www.sportscardforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=61541&d=1340685450[/IMG]

[QUOTE=bigbensbff;3302005]me neither. i think it's one of the dumbest arguments in the hobby.[/QUOTE]


the base cards are the true rcs for both finest and chrome. autos are variations or inserts, but the hobby views them as rc year cards anyway.

[QUOTE=The_Reverend;3302074]I would go with these if he does not sign NT or EXQUISITE. Out of /299 and on-card

[IMG]http://www.sportscardforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=61541&d=1340685450[/IMG][/QUOTE]

I love these cards, although that absolute above is sweet I'd much rather have this.

the absolute is not a true rc but is a sweet card.

Absolute, Crown, Chrome any other good products that are on-card except for Gold Standard, as he signed too many of them. How he signed 525 Gold Standards, but can't sign NT is ridiculous!

I wouldn't buy anything in a college jersey, but that's just me. It's not his rookie college year..

I did not know that the topps chrome had on-card autos of julio. The only ones I have seen have been stickers. Certified just looks too blan with the chicklet swatches

Julio does not have a chrome base auto...he only has a refractor variation version, so I guess technically it isn't a 'true' RC

[QUOTE=The_Reverend;3302769]I did not know that the topps chrome had on-card autos of julio. The only ones I have seen have been stickers. Certified just looks too blan with the chicklet swatches[/QUOTE]

They don't, I meant any other brand that happened to be on card. Sorry, should have been clearer on that.