View Single Post
Old 05-23-2019, 08:42 PM   #1549
rcmb3220
Member
 
rcmb3220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KhalDrogo View Post
I believe that is likely the case.

After the DiMaggio scandal, PWCC should have been barred from grading with PSA. Their willingness to eat that loss may have preserved the relationship. However, I hope PSA is examining that relationship again. All eyes are on them now. PWCC is a known submitter of altered cards to PSA. It doesn’t matter if it’s on the behalf of a client. And that arguably makes it worse as they are enabling that individual’s fraud.
Yeah why the hell would they eat the loss when it’s PSA that missed it and PSA that has the guarantee?

I asked rhetorically.
rcmb3220 is offline   Reply With Quote