Quote:
Originally Posted by pac213up
Yes. Testing helps to read, react, and make better decisions faster to slow transmission and isolate pockets of infection. Lack of testing slowed our ability to recover faster.
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk
|
What percentage of tests would have been acceptable? Enough for 1/8 of Americans? A quarter? Half? Would something like 50 or 75 million tests readily available have been OK? How realistic would that be for a novel virus?