Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdan67
You're so off it's insane- Your tagline in your profile literally says %$%*$% the celtics, yet you're not emotional about this? Ok dude. Please elaborate how Y3 Giannis numbers are so wildly better than Y3 Tatum's such that you can immediately write off Tatum's potential? I'm willing to change my stance...You absolutely have not addressed that one.
|
I already explained to you that is not apples to apples like you claimed it was. And I’ve made plenty of points you never addressed as well. At the end of the day if you think age is what matters then congratulations! You’ve set Giannis age 25 as your benchmark given your current argument. I’m totally willing to say that 1. Giannis is better than Tatum now. 2. Tatum will not achieve what Giannis did by age 25. Tatum won’t have a superstar career this is my overall point, I cede the fact Tatum is better Y3 than Giannis was y3 which is a very random thing to cherry pick since Giannis came in totally differently from Tatum as he’s a physical specimen who had to learn the game. Not an apples to apples comparison but I agree, if Tatum prices today were where Giannis prices were in 2016, that’s be a great buy. The issue is they’re about 1200x.
And yes I hate the Celtics. Basketball is not emotional unless it’s like a great person winning a chip or something. I don’t feel the emotion of anger or hate towards teams I dislike on a literal level, I make fun of them for fun. See the difference? You’re really taking this way too seriously. I’m making basketball criticisms about a player who is overvalued, that’s not personal.