View Single Post
Old 03-05-2025, 09:33 PM   #12
fabiani12333
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 11,446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottish Punk View Post
This seems very arbitrary. The vet votes is supposed to give players who may have been missed a chance. So what if some players reappear. The committee picks the finalists anyways. Just pick different guys if you want to switch it up. The voters aren't obligated to vote on them.
I think this change is meant to reduce the pool of candidates over time so that players with a stronger case can get more attention and support.

But ultimately, it seems to be a way to eliminate players like Bonds and Clemens from future consideration by committees that might be more inclined to vote for them.
fabiani12333 is offline   Reply With Quote