View Single Post
Old 06-12-2025, 09:32 AM   #33
f2tornado
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 2,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary View Post
It does look that way, but it wasn't that long ago people said the same about BGS......look at BGS now a clear number 4 of the big 4.
Truth. Even the CU forum people acknowledged back in the day that BGS was the way to go for Chrome stuff with PSA/SGC better for vintage. Same talk on Beckett forum and the Freedom Cardboard split from there.

Then a series of unfortunate events led to where BGS is now.

Take a Frank Thomas 1990 Leaf. It will cost you around $160 for the gem mint PSA 10 and averages about $60 for the BGS gem mint 9.5.

Take a 2000 Topps Chrome Traded Miguel Cabrera. It will cost you about $800 for the PSA 10 and about $300 for the BGS 9.5.

It was only about 10 years ago those roles were reversed, albeit not so extreme.

Yes, it's possible to run a good name into the ground. That said, the only thing in the next decade that would hurt PSA would be a startup with massive capital and the odds of that happening are slim.
f2tornado is online now   Reply With Quote