How do true RPA NT's hold for players that don't make it?

[Milz187]

Will say a PSA 10 hold well, my thinking is it depends on the class as people might want to collect that years set but i thought i'll ask the question here and get some thoughts.

[NBAicons]

In the history of RPA's, the only rookie set collectors seem to really go after is 03-04 Exquisite. I wouldn't think NT RPA's of non-stars hold up well at all, regardless of year. Just do some eBay completed searches and see.

[Nomad]

If I was collecting a set of a class I would go for Flawless, cause you want game used.

Those late 90s UD RPAs must hold up somewhat well.

[Milz187]

Originally Posted by Nomad

If I was collecting a set of a class I would go for Flawless, cause you want game used.

Those late 90s UD RPAs must hold up somewhat well.

Yeah from the current years it's only flawless ay, which should put them on the top but i don't think they are ahead of NT yet right? The set i was looking at was 2018 Immac which were game used

[Milz187]

Originally Posted by NBAicons

In the history of RPA's, the only rookie set collectors seem to really go after is 03-04 Exquisite. I wouldn't think NT RPA's of non-stars hold up well at all, regardless of year. Just do some eBay completed searches and see.

Yeah i did some digging, they seem decent compared to their other autos. Like a base auto from another set with be $5 and the RPA would be say $200ish