Fan hit by foul ball

[trask7]

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/2...tting-too-late

[mcnail]

ugh, heart-wrenching. all for full netting if they decide to go that way.

[CoolG]

Was watching it live on TV
Just terrible and hope for best for the young girl
Almora was so distraught and broke down in tears.
He’s a very classy young man.

[chuckerrrr]

Did not see it but hate reading this especially as a father of two toddlers. The other week I was at Round Rock Express (Astros) Minor League team and was sitting on 3rd base area with my wife and lil ones. Whenever a lefty came in to bat (Alvarez, Tucker) I got to admit I was a little nervous. Sometimes on those late swings when they slice it. Anyhow really hope the girl is ok.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bloodwings19]

No one was man enough to protect the girl that is the fault. If they want to put netting along the lines, they might as well put netting in the outfield for home runs. When I was young going to games there was always warning about being attentive of balls. Sad a little girl didn't know what happen because there were no men to protect her.

[coachnip13]

Originally Posted by bloodwings19

No one was man enough to protect the girl that is the fault. If they want to put netting along the lines, they might as well put netting in the outfield for home runs. When I was young going to games there was always warning about being attentive of balls. Sad a little girl didn't know what happen because there were no men to protect her.

Lame, but we knew this crap was coming.

[PDCCollectibles]

Originally Posted by coachnip13

Lame, but we knew this crap was coming.

There is always one in every crowd....

[trask7]

Originally Posted by bloodwings19

No one was man enough to protect the girl that is the fault. If they want to put netting along the lines, they might as well put netting in the outfield for home runs. When I was young going to games there was always warning about being attentive of balls. Sad a little girl didn't know what happen because there were no men to protect her.

They will put up netting to help everyone. That is a unique approach to blame a man for not protecting her. 90mph and 1.5 second it hit her, I guess it would have taken a MLB man to save her.

Anyone taking a stance on keep the nets down has lost touch with reality. The game is faster and more dangerous.

[jbrown36836]

Originally Posted by trask7

They will put up netting to help everyone. That is a unique approach to blame a man for not protecting her. 90mph and 1.5 second it hit her, I guess it would have taken a MLB man to save her.

Anyone taking a stance on keep the nets down has lost touch with reality. The game is faster and more dangerous.

When the "extend the netting" talk first started, I admit I was pretty against it. But too many people are getting hit, and it really doesn't hinder viewing for the fans (my main point of contention in the first place). Seeing this little girl get hit just shows that it's necessary. Hope she's ok

[Fudd]

Originally Posted by jbrown36836

When the "extend the netting" talk first started, I admit I was pretty against it. But too many people are getting hit, and it really doesn't hinder viewing for the fans (my main point of contention in the first place). Seeing this little girl get hit just shows that it's necessary. Hope she's ok

me too. takes the closeness out of the game. Especially when you're paying 1000 for dugout seats at Dodger Stadium. I simply don't go anymore and the netting is one of many reasons.

Everyone should be collecting Albert Almora cards. The guy is gold!

[Hollywood42]

Come on... Even if your first sentence was true, the ball is hit so much harder and seats are so much closer than they typically were 20, 30, 40 years ago. I've sat close before and have had a near miss or two with screaming foul balls that I could have done absolutely nothing about, even while focusing entirely on the game

Looking forward to the inevitable "but I can't see with the netting" complaints next. Actually, most people's eyes completely filter the net out after a few minutes. And even if you actually are the rare exception- suck it up. The things protect the fans. Deal with it so we don't have to hear news like this

Originally Posted by bloodwings19

No one was man enough to protect the girl that is the fault. If they want to put netting along the lines, they might as well put netting in the outfield for home runs. When I was young going to games there was always warning about being attentive of balls. Sad a little girl didn't know what happen because there were no men to protect her.

[Eckstein197]

Any update on the little girl??

[AnthonyCorona]

Originally Posted by Hollywood42

Come on... Even if your first sentence was true, the ball is hit so much harder and seats are so much closer than they typically were 20, 30, 40 years ago. I've sat close before and have had a near miss or two with screaming foul balls that I could have done absolutely nothing about, even while focusing entirely on the game



Looking forward to the inevitable "but I can't see with the netting" complaints next. Actually, most people's eyes completely filter the net out after a few minutes. And even if you actually are the rare exception- suck it up. The things protect the fans. Deal with it so we don't have to hear news like this

I go to A ball games and I’ve been glad for the netting a few times. Despite what some people think, there is almost no time to react. My local team put nets up after the lady got hit with a bat in Boston, it was very distracting for about 1 minute, now I don’t even notice it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ucLAkers]

Originally Posted by bloodwings19

No one was man enough to protect the girl that is the fault. If they want to put netting along the lines, they might as well put netting in the outfield for home runs. When I was young going to games there was always warning about being attentive of balls. Sad a little girl didn't know what happen because there were no men to protect her.

.....yea ok....

[RandyC]

Originally Posted by bloodwings19

No one was man enough to protect the girl that is the fault. If they want to put netting along the lines, they might as well put netting in the outfield for home runs. When I was young going to games there was always warning about being attentive of balls. Sad a little girl didn't know what happen because there were no men to protect her.

What a moronic statement, but I'm not surprised.

[jmmintz]

Originally Posted by bloodwings19

No one was man enough to protect the girl that is the fault. If they want to put netting along the lines, they might as well put netting in the outfield for home runs. When I was young going to games there was always warning about being attentive of balls. Sad a little girl didn't know what happen because there were no men to protect her.

Originally Posted by danimal875

Lille children should not be allowed to sit that close. It isn’t a playground. It’s a dangerous game and we should be able to enjoy it without some big goofy net in front of us. There are plenty of places already that we don’t allow small children for safety reasons.

I'm guessing neither of you have kids, because those are both absurd statements on different levels.

They have to put some sort of protection up. Players today are stronger and faster than ever, and the seats are closer to the field.

MLB has a massive problem with fan loss in this country - what used to be the most popular game in the country is now - at best - third behind the NBA and the NFL. Alienating ANY fans is not good for the game. They should WANT little kids sitting close enough to see.

And if peoples' main argument is not getting autos, that is a small price to pay for my kids' well being.

[SupermanBrandon]

Originally Posted by bloodwings19

No one was man enough to protect the girl that is the fault. If they want to put netting along the lines, they might as well put netting in the outfield for home runs. When I was young going to games there was always warning about being attentive of balls. Sad a little girl didn't know what happen because there were no men to protect her.

Dumbest post of the week. Let me guess you're also the "get off my lawn guy". Should we also go back to batters not wearing helmets and catchers with barely any gear on? Change with the times my friend.

[Peties Army]

Originally Posted by SupermanBrandon

Dumbest post of the week. Let me guess you're also the "get off my lawn guy". Should we also go back to batters not wearing helmets and catchers with barely any gear on? Change with the times my friend.

Huh? While is point was dumb not sure yours is much better. What is he saying that means it should go backwards in safety? Seems like he is saying the opposite

[SupermanBrandon]

Originally Posted by Peties Army

Huh? While is point was dumb not sure yours is much better. What is he saying that means it should go backwards in safety? Seems like he is saying the opposite

Im saying you have to change with the times. If they never put helmets on batters, imagine where we would be. Or better safety gear on catchers. Safety upgrades are necessary...especially here. It's something thats been talked about for years. Is it going to take a child dying before they take the necessary next steps? And don't blame a man for not stepping in the way.

[OC22]

Originally Posted by bloodwings19

No one was man enough to protect the girl that is the fault. If they want to put netting along the lines, they might as well put netting in the outfield for home runs. When I was young going to games there was always warning about being attentive of balls. Sad a little girl didn't know what happen because there were no men to protect her.

You're such a man, why don't you go catch an Jordan Hicks fastball with no catchers gear and no glove. Clown.

[Eckstein197]

Originally Posted by OC22

You're such a man, why don't you go catch an Jordan Hicks fastball with no catchers gear and no glove. Clown.

You must be a fan of the Starting 9 podcast, and I 100% agree

[jhssketchcards]

I was watching the game myself on TV and it got me. As a dad of 6 kids I understood where Almora was coming from and I not only hurt for the girl and her family but also Albert. What an emotional reminder that life can change very quickly.
As far as the netting goes, I agree that it’s dangerous and safety measures will need to be looked at more. One thing that has changed more than the game speed, is distractions. Fans are distracted more than ever. When I was a kid we went to Series in Houston (2-4 game series). My favorite thing to do was keep score in my program, and still do. I watched EVERY pitch. So did my family. Occasionally we would talk but it was between pitches or innings. We understood it was dangerous and we respected the fact a ball could come at us. When my wife and I took our youngest to MMP a few years ago for his first game we sat 1B side behind the dugout, and I watched EVERY pitch. I sat on his and my wife’s left in case anything came near us. I also would not allow him to bring in his iPod and I wouldn’t check my phone unless it was a break in the game. Bottom line is fans are distracted more than they used to be. Posting on Facebook, Instagram and boredom cause people to check their devices constantly. It’s the same reason texting and driving has become a crime. To me it’s always sad when anyone gets hurt at a game, and yes the speed of the ball may be faster, but we have to admit there are more people distracted
At games than ever before. Maybe ballparks can implement a. No cell phone/device rule along the lower levels for added protection. Security can warn them once and if they continue to do it they are removed for safety. Parks can use security cameras and game cameras to spot offenders.
I personally think if you removed the distractions of phones and devices you’d possibly help reduce the number of people injured by foul balls.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[glassnickels]

Originally Posted by jhssketchcards

I was watching the game myself on TV and it got me. As a dad of 6 kids I understood where Almora was coming from and I not only hurt for the girl and her family but also Albert. What an emotional reminder that life can change very quickly.
As far as the netting goes, I agree that it’s dangerous and safety measures will need to be looked at more. One thing that has changed more than the game speed, is distractions. Fans are distracted more than ever. When I was a kid we went to Series in Houston (2-4 game series). My favorite thing to do was keep score in my program, and still do. I watched EVERY pitch. So did my family. Occasionally we would talk but it was between pitches or innings. We understood it was dangerous and we respected the fact a ball could come at us. When my wife and I took our youngest to MMP a few years ago for his first game we sat 1B side behind the dugout, and I watched EVERY pitch. I sat on his and my wife’s left in case anything came near us. I also would not allow him to bring in his iPod and I wouldn’t check my phone unless it was a break in the game. Bottom line is fans are distracted more than they used to be. Posting on Facebook, Instagram and boredom cause people to check their devices constantly. It’s the same reason texting and driving has become a crime. To me it’s always sad when anyone gets hurt at a game, and yes the speed of the ball may be faster, but we have to admit there are more people distracted
At games than ever before. Maybe ballparks can implement a. No cell phone/device rule along the lower levels for added protection. Security can warn them once and if they continue to do it they are removed for safety. Parks can use security cameras and game cameras to spot offenders.
I personally think if you removed the distractions of phones and devices you’d possibly help reduce the number of people injured by foul balls.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There wouldn't be anyone at games then. Separating people from their phones is impossible.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[Eckstein197]

Originally Posted by glassnickels

There wouldn't be anyone at games then. Separating people from their phones is impossible.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

This 100%. Separating people from their phones will destroy MLB attendance

[jhssketchcards]

Originally Posted by glassnickels

There wouldn't be anyone at games then. Separating people from their phones is impossible.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Well you wouldn’t have a lot of people go to games either because putting nets all around the park would eliminate autographs and fan interactions with players as much as it happens now. Movie theaters do it BTW, and I’m sure people still go to those.m so your argument is weak and untrue. If people can’t go somewhere for an couple of hours and not use their phone then they need help. If I can drive 3 hours to Houston without checking my phone unless I’m stopped and out of the vehicle, then people can sit at a game for 3 hours and not check their phone except for given opportunities to do it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk