Blowout Cards Forums
AD Heritage

Go Back   Blowout Cards Forums > BLOWOUTS HOBBY TALK > FOOTBALL

Notices

FOOTBALL Post your Football Cards Hobby Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2021, 10:58 AM   #1
ReggieBush22
Member
 
ReggieBush22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,674
Default What do you think are the 5 most "iconic" football cards ever?

Mines in no particular order.

1965 Topps Joe Namath RC
1957 Topps Johnny Unitas RC
1981 Topps Joe Montana RC
1986 Topps Jerry Rice RC
2000 Playoff Contenders Tom Brady RC
ReggieBush22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 10:59 AM   #2
smanzari
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 10,800
Default

1935 National Chicle Rockne
1955 Topps All-American Jim Thorpe

are 2 important cards IMO
smanzari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:14 AM   #3
ReggieBush22
Member
 
ReggieBush22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smanzari View Post
1935 National Chicle Rockne
1955 Topps All-American Jim Thorpe

are 2 important cards IMO
Yeah, this happens all the time when we get into this topic. Some people name the most rarest and/or expensive cards. To me, "iconic" is more than just value. It's the significance and/or impression left on a hobby for whatever reason. For example, take baseball. The 1989 Upper Deck Ken Griffey card is only worth about $100 raw but anyone who lived through that era can testify it is without a doubt one of THE most iconic baseball cards ever because it ushered in the new "modern" era of cards with Upper Deck. The classic pose, card #1 in the set, etc all make it "iconic."
ReggieBush22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 10:59 AM   #4
smanzari
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 10,800
Default

dupe post
smanzari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:09 AM   #5
TheFrenzy
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texan in AZ
Posts: 44,115
Default

Iconic as in "most instantly recognizable"?

1935 National Chicle, Bronko Nagurski
1958 Topps, Jim Brown RC
1965 Topps Joe Namath RC
1981 Topps Joe Montana RC
2000 Playoff Contenders Tom Brady RC
TheFrenzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:48 AM   #6
ReggieBush22
Member
 
ReggieBush22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFrenzy View Post
Iconic as in "most instantly recognizable"?

1935 National Chicle, Bronko Nagurski
1958 Topps, Jim Brown RC
1965 Topps Joe Namath RC
1981 Topps Joe Montana RC
2000 Playoff Contenders Tom Brady RC
Can't disagree with this list. I think the 3 bolded HAVE to be top 5 by default for various reasons. I probably should've included the 1935 Bronko too, which is sort of like the Babe Ruth version of a super early card that's significant in the hobby,
ReggieBush22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2021, 03:23 PM   #7
pip
Member
 
pip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: French underground
Posts: 4,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFrenzy View Post
Iconic as in "most instantly recognizable"?

1935 National Chicle, Bronko Nagurski
1958 Topps, Jim Brown RC
1965 Topps Joe Namath RC
1981 Topps Joe Montana RC
2000 Playoff Contenders Tom Brady RC
My picks as well except substitute 1976 Walter Payton for Montana. The 1952 Bowman Large Buck Lansford would be the next card out.
__________________
Dealers to avoid -- https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpost.php?p=14831085&postcount=1
pip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:19 AM   #8
asujbl
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 64,543
Send a message via MSN to asujbl
Default

I don’t think the Montana is iconic at all. Not sure why. I just don’t. I think more people would recognize, and to me that matters, something like a Barry Sanders Score before the Montana

81 just falls in that spot where it’s not “super vintage” like a Namath but is just old enough that collectors in their 30-45 range weren’t necessarily buying 81 Topps

I’d say the Marino rookie is more “iconic” than Montana.

It’s why Rice definitely is. Guys my age were 5 years old and starting to buy 86 Topps

That’s not a player judgement

84 is just more in the sweet spot
__________________
https://ohiosundevils.smugmug.com/
Browns/Cavs/Tribe/Buckeyes/Jackets/Devils
TheFrenzy - “Blowout ain't a place for normies”
asujbl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:34 AM   #9
ReggieBush22
Member
 
ReggieBush22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asujbl View Post
I don’t think the Montana is iconic at all. Not sure why. I just don’t. I think more people would recognize, and to me that matters, something like a Barry Sanders Score before the Montana

81 just falls in that spot where it’s not “super vintage” like a Namath but is just old enough that collectors in their 30-45 range weren’t necessarily buying 81 Topps

I’d say the Marino rookie is more “iconic” than Montana.

It’s why Rice definitely is. Guys my age were 5 years old and starting to buy 86 Topps

That’s not a player judgement

84 is just more in the sweet spot
This is obviously a subjective topic but the Montana RC is absolutely iconic. I remember in 1989 when I was a teenager seeing this card sell for $175 in Beckett as he kept winning SBs. Now, keep in mind, cards sold for much cheaper back then and a Marino was selling for about $30 and Rice for about $10. This card was smoking hot and sold at prices that were unheard of back then. Everyone wanted this card.

I agree about the Barry and also thought about including it (my top 10 for sure). Like I mentioned about 1989 UD Griffey for baseball, the Barry Score kind of ushered in the "modern" era football cards.
ReggieBush22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:36 AM   #10
asujbl
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 64,543
Send a message via MSN to asujbl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReggieBush22 View Post
This is obviously a subjective topic but the Montana RC is absolutely iconic. I remember in 1989 when I was a teenager seeing this card sell for $175 in Beckett as he kept winning SBs. Now, keep in mind, cards sold for much cheaper back then and a Marino was selling for about $30 and Rice for about $10. This card was smoking hot and sold at prices that were unheard of back then. Everyone wanted this card.

I agree about the Barry and also thought about including it (my top 10 for sure). Like I mentioned about 1989 UD Griffey for baseball, the Barry Score kind of ushered in the "modern" era football cards.
Disagree

But it’s absolutely subjective
__________________
https://ohiosundevils.smugmug.com/
Browns/Cavs/Tribe/Buckeyes/Jackets/Devils
TheFrenzy - “Blowout ain't a place for normies”
asujbl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:50 AM   #11
RW3FAN
Member
 
RW3FAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,659
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asujbl View Post
I don’t think the Montana is iconic at all. Not sure why. I just don’t. I think more people would recognize, and to me that matters, something like a Barry Sanders Score before the Montana

81 just falls in that spot where it’s not “super vintage” like a Namath but is just old enough that collectors in their 30-45 range weren’t necessarily buying 81 Topps

I’d say the Marino rookie is more “iconic” than Montana.

It’s why Rice definitely is. Guys my age were 5 years old and starting to buy 86 Topps

That’s not a player judgement

84 is just more in the sweet spot
Give me a Walter Payton RC over Joe any day.
RW3FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 12:00 PM   #12
asujbl
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 64,543
Send a message via MSN to asujbl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RW3FAN View Post
Give me a Walter Payton RC over Joe any day.
I would agree

Montana simply isn’t one of the first 5 cards I think of. Maybe not Top 10

And that’s iconic to me

Not that Montana is a Top 3 QB ever. Irrelevant
__________________
https://ohiosundevils.smugmug.com/
Browns/Cavs/Tribe/Buckeyes/Jackets/Devils
TheFrenzy - “Blowout ain't a place for normies”
asujbl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2021, 03:39 PM   #13
gmarutiak
Member
 
gmarutiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD (but Pittsburgh in my heart!)
Posts: 3,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asujbl View Post
I don’t think the Montana is iconic at all. Not sure why. I just don’t. I think more people would recognize, and to me that matters, something like a Barry Sanders Score before the Montana

81 just falls in that spot where it’s not “super vintage” like a Namath but is just old enough that collectors in their 30-45 range weren’t necessarily buying 81 Topps

I’d say the Marino rookie is more “iconic” than Montana.

It’s why Rice definitely is. Guys my age were 5 years old and starting to buy 86 Topps

That’s not a player judgement

84 is just more in the sweet spot
Normally, I would say that opinions, by definition, can't be wrong. Your opinion is the exception to that rule. '81 Montana is top 5 iconic.
gmarutiak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:30 AM   #14
TheFrenzy
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texan in AZ
Posts: 44,115
Default

If the list was longer, that 1993 SP foil Drew Bledsoe RC would probably surprise a lot of younger collectors with how high it would rank.
TheFrenzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:32 AM   #15
asujbl
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 64,543
Send a message via MSN to asujbl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFrenzy View Post
If the list was longer, that 1993 SP foil Drew Bledsoe RC would probably surprise a lot of younger collectors with how high it would rank.
Oh man… if you had one from like 93-96? You ran the neighborhood
__________________
https://ohiosundevils.smugmug.com/
Browns/Cavs/Tribe/Buckeyes/Jackets/Devils
TheFrenzy - “Blowout ain't a place for normies”
asujbl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:35 AM   #16
ssbledsoe
Member
 
ssbledsoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: At least 500 feet from DB11
Posts: 29,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFrenzy View Post
If the list was longer, that 1993 SP foil Drew Bledsoe RC would probably surprise a lot of younger collectors with how high it would rank.
Quote:
Originally Posted by asujbl View Post
Oh man… if you had one from like 93-96? You ran the neighborhood
Inject this into my veins
__________________
Drew Bledsoe is a better QB than Patrick Mahomes
ssbledsoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:42 AM   #17
TheFrenzy
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Texan in AZ
Posts: 44,115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssbledsoe View Post
Inject this into my veins
I mean, you could almost flip a 1993 Bledsoe SP foil PSA 10 for a raw Brady Bowman RC.
TheFrenzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:51 AM   #18
ssbledsoe
Member
 
ssbledsoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: At least 500 feet from DB11
Posts: 29,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFrenzy View Post
I mean, you could almost flip a 1993 Bledsoe SP foil PSA 10 for a raw Brady Bowman RC.
I could do this a few times...
__________________
Drew Bledsoe is a better QB than Patrick Mahomes
ssbledsoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 12:19 PM   #19
Siberian13
Member
 
Siberian13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 80,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFrenzy View Post
If the list was longer, that 1993 SP foil Drew Bledsoe RC would probably surprise a lot of younger collectors with how high it would rank.
This reminds of the movie Tropic Thunder. Never go full re…..
Siberian13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 11:44 AM   #20
JeremyNick
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 22,801
Default

With the new generation, 2017 Mahomes Prizm should be on the list. That card will define a generation of collecting.
JeremyNick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 12:13 PM   #21
tjforce
Member
 
tjforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 23,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyNick View Post
With the new generation, 2017 Mahomes Prizm should be on the list. That card will define a generation of collecting.
That's going to be the interesting thing...

The Prizm is the "common" rookie that a lot of collectors have a chance to get, but now the NT is the most expensive football card ever sold. You'll be seeing some version of the NT a lot moving forward.

Whereas Jim Brown has 1 rookie. Montana has 1 rookie. Brady has a bunch, but only 1 rookie auto, and its from an important set.
__________________
"Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because it’s the best thing going. Wooooo!"
tjforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 12:17 PM   #22
hermanotarjeta
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 23,347
Default

1958 topps Jim brown
1976 topps Walter Payton
1981 topps joe Montana
1989 score Barry Sanders
2000 contenders Brady
hermanotarjeta is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 12:19 PM   #23
JeremyNick
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 22,801
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjforce View Post
That's going to be the interesting thing...

The Prizm is the "common" rookie that a lot of collectors have a chance to get, but now the NT is the most expensive football card ever sold. You'll be seeing some version of the NT a lot moving forward.

Whereas Jim Brown has 1 rookie. Montana has 1 rookie. Brady has a bunch, but only 1 rookie auto, and its from an important set.
I guess it’s back to how you define iconic.

To me NT isn’t iconic. It’s not a singular card. The Prizm base (silver) Mahomes is a singular iconic card. Even the variations are still just different colors of that singular image.

People can’t even grasp what the true NT RPA is at times.
JeremyNick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 12:23 PM   #24
asujbl
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 64,543
Send a message via MSN to asujbl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyNick View Post
I guess it’s back to how you define iconic.

To me NT isn’t iconic. It’s not a singular card. The Prizm base (silver) Mahomes is a singular iconic card. Even the variations are still just different colors of that singular image.

People can’t even grasp what the true NT RPA is at times.
This is correct

I have no idea what the actual RPA even looks like

I’ve seen multiple horizontal cards? Vertical? I honestly have no idea what is what… and I’ve been around a while

It’s not iconic

It’s just expensive

I don’t know when that stopped… maybe Andrew Luck? That’s the last RPA where I knew what the hell I was looking at
__________________
https://ohiosundevils.smugmug.com/
Browns/Cavs/Tribe/Buckeyes/Jackets/Devils
TheFrenzy - “Blowout ain't a place for normies”
asujbl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2021, 12:05 PM   #25
altaeria
Member
 
altaeria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: CenterCityPhiladelphia
Posts: 1,934
Default

hmmm.... So far it sounds like maybe only 2 truly fit the bill, regardless of "subjectivity": Namath and Brady.
altaeria is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2019, Blowout Cards Inc.