![]() |
|
BASKETBALL Post your Basketball Cards Hobby Talk |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#3326 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
I seriously don’t get the “take someone out of context and post demeaning comment even though it’s not what they said or intended” shtick. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3327 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,199
|
![]() Quote:
I just go back to my primary point: too many cards. That's what's going to hold the card back. If you want a long-term hold, get a Star 101. Last edited by GatorPie; 03-24-2021 at 07:32 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3328 | |||
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 41,079
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3329 |
Member
|
![]()
100% agree on that.
__________________
Cards: http://www.instagram.com/cardcollecting82 My artwork: http://www.instagram.com/sebreg Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/190656817@N03/albums |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3330 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]()
I figure it this way: using the rule of 72 and growth of around 7% a year, the average expected return on the Dow over the next decade is about 2x. (Over the past 50 or so years, the Dow went from around 1K to around 32K. Yep, that's about a doubling every decade on average.) I'm pretty sure if you built an index of blue-chip sports cards its average return exceeds the Dow's, because of the marginal-luxury-dollar-outlet thingy. But let's just assume a return equaling the Dow's expected average return, and a price floor of $6K really soon. (I mean, I'm speaking of a *floor*. It might not reach that floor.) An expected Dow of 4x in 20 years, merely matched in growth in blue-chip cards, means an expected $24K for a NM-MT #57 20 years from now. And $48K 30 years from now.
The growth for #101 will probably resemble more that of rare vintage material. All I know is that since 36 years ago, the NM-MT Wagner has increased probably in the area of 100x while the Dow has gone up about 20x. But that's an exceptional case of something ultra-rare, so you'd have to temper expectations somewhat for the #101, but not to merely-tracking-Dow-growth levels. The point being that the known rarity of the #101 relative to the #57 doesn't somehow suppress average demand for the #57 but fuels it for the #101 (and other Star issues and rare inserts/parallels). Sure there are a "ton" of #57s but also a ton of demand that just can't be driven into these rare items because they are in fact so rare (but aside from, oh, the '95 Natural Born Thrillers I'm not seeing the inherent aesthetic and rookie-card-oriented collector appeal that would justify PMG Green prices above and beyond their contrived ultra-rarity . . . and a PSA 10 #57 can be expected to command $1M using the *modest* Dow-tracking formula above and a short-term price floor of $200k within about . . . well, 23 years ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3331 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 41,079
|
![]()
Calling the peak of 57 now is like calling the peak of AAPL back at the end of 2012. This is the ebb and flow of the market. As an owner of zero 57s, they will regain their lost ground as supply and demand balances out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3332 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]() Quote:
My analysis is based on total-market-value (not sure whether "market capitalization" is the right terminology here) and so isn't affected by the relatively large quantity (compared to Star issues or rare inserts/parallels). The large quantity of them is already built into price expectations. The small quantity of rare Star issues and the insert/parallels figures into the extra boost they should be expected to get, assuming that the marginal luxury dollars from financial wealth increases (whether from Apple stock or higher-risk-higher-return emerging-markets funds or what have you) will flow into them first and foremost. So, sure, the #101 should be a better hold longer-term. That probably means being affected more by short-term risks a la the emerging-market funds, or other factors. I mean, after all, the 'NM-MT' Wagner went from $100K to $640K in 6 years, meaning that a $10M valuation now means underperforming the Dow since '91 (something like a 15x for the Wagner vs. 30x for the Dow), although vastly outperforming the Dow for that 6 years (over 6x as compared to around 2x). The PMG Green MJ fits the very profile of a luxury asset but those take the heaviest hits in recessions.... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3333 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,199
|
![]()
We're going to revisit this discussion in 50 years and some of you guys are going to look foolish. I will be right here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3334 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 333
|
![]()
Some of you are killing me, taking about the 57 like it’s yesterday’s trash now. Lol. Give me a break. It’s the most iconic Jordan card on the face of the Earth. It has probably been resubmitted so many times that its population is severely inflated. For the popularity of Jordan as the goat and the popularity of basketball as a global game, I really don’t think there are very many to go around. Add in the fact that there was a deluge of these put onto the market lately and you shouldn’t be surprised that it has come back down to where it has. But over time it will trend upwards. If you don’t think so give me an example of another similarly iconic card that has gone down in value over the years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3335 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 41,079
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3336 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 333
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3337 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]()
As my analysis made clear, I'm not disagreeing that the #101 will experience higher average returns than #57 over the long run. My analysis also says that even assuming a $6K price floor and merely rising along with the Dow, in 50 years we'll see an expected 32x of the Dow (assuming 7% growth). 32 x $6K is nearly $200K, close to 10x the recent Feb 2021 peak. Sounds entirely plausible to me, and again that's a modest projection. (It likely means even more impressive returns on the #101. What's 32 times 2 times a short-term floor for 8s of $30K? Around $2M? Okay, sounds believable. That's 10 times the expected 50-year price for a #57 compared to a 5x-ish ratio right now.)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3338 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 41,079
|
![]()
Had to go look this up again. Went from over $100k to $51k in a June auction with PWCC. So a 50% haircut that some said wasn’t recoverable. Yet here we are, and people think the card can’t recover from a lesser drop?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3339 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,199
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3340 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3341 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 41,079
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3342 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]()
The real question is, what price growth are PSA 10 87F Stickers going to see? Overall a great-looking card from early in MJ's career and very low pop-report figures for 10s (as in a couple dozen). Now that's a grail right there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3343 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
I prefer the Star 101 for relative potential upside, plus I'm one of those people who just has preference for "true" rookie hence my bias. Pop, 1st year pro card, etc, I like those aspects of the Star. But I doubt it ever displaces the Fleer as the face of the hobby, that card is entrenched and has extreme mainstream appeal.
__________________
Cards: http://www.instagram.com/cardcollecting82 My artwork: http://www.instagram.com/sebreg Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/190656817@N03/albums |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3344 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]() Quote:
What's 32x times 32x? Yep, the Dow in 50 years will be around 1M, give or take short-term fluctuations. (S&P returns will be even bigger.) Prices these days will look like a steal. Didn't that NM-MT Wagner go for $1K in '73? It's ~10,000x since then. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3345 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Illinois
Posts: 697
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3346 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 6,492
|
![]()
If PSA 8s have a $6K floor, then PSA 9s have around an $18K floor, which may well mean BGS 9s have a $10K floor. $18K for PSA 9s is around 50% of what they are hitting now, and still 3x what they were a year ago.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3347 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,199
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3348 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 333
|
![]() Quote:
Gator, you kind of come off as having a heaping helping of sour grapes, if I'm being honest. And you peak of the future with such absolute certainty. Do you own a crystal ball? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3349 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,199
|
![]()
Don’t have sour grapes. If I never acquire the 57 so be it.
The card went ballistic over a year. Even the BGS 9 falling to 10K is still significantly higher than it was before. Honestly, why does that seem so far fetched to you guys? The floor of a card rising 500% in a year makes me "delusional"? If I’m wrong so be it, I’ll take the abuse. But I stand by what I said - you’ll be able to get a BGS 9 57 for under 10K within six months. COVID is over. The stimulus payments are over. "The Last Dance" boost is over. It's time to return to reality. Last edited by GatorPie; 03-25-2021 at 02:44 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3350 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 587
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|