2020 Politics Thread - Enter At Your Own Risk - RULES IN OP

[hairysasquatch]

Originally Posted by JeremyNick

It’s a simple question. You going to accept the eager or tuck your tail between your legs?

I mean, if you’re going to run your mouth, do it.

Otherwise go back to your safe space.

You'll get the kid holding in a fart meme as a response. It's his only shtick.

[ballhawkdawk]

I’m giving Heel the benefit of the doubt and going with the facetious angle.

[Brobocop]

Originally Posted by cnewby

Its typed on a forum, you don't know any better than he does what they meant.

Hence why I said "believe" in my comment.

[Brobocop]

Originally Posted by JeremyNick

Do you believe in the abominable snowman too?

I do not. Next question.

[JeremyNick]

Originally Posted by TheHeel

It is going right over your head, LoveIt.

I’m asking a yes or no question and you’re dancing like you’re on stage with Beyoncé.

It’s simple Heel, yes or no?

[JeremyNick]

Originally Posted by Brobocop

I do not. Next question.

Do you always white knight for trolls?

[cnewby]

Originally Posted by Brobocop

Hence why I said "believe" in my comment.

And my statements still stands true.

[TheHeel]

Originally Posted by ballhawkdawk

I’m giving Heel the benefit of the doubt and going with the facetious angle.

Yup!

Originally Posted by JeremyNick

I’m asking a yes or no question and you’re dancing like you’re on stage with Beyoncé.

It’s simple Heel, yes or no?

[Astros19]

Originally Posted by jdandns

Calm down, old man.
That was standard convention procedure.
Have you never watched one before?
Her remarks were pre-approved, and not a surprise to anyone.
She was seconding Sanders' nomination after a different speaker initially called for it.

You honestly thought she went "rogue" and made that up right there on the spot, didn't you?

Yikes.

https://www.aol.com/article/news/202...-dnc/24593736/

From the above:
Ocasio-Cortez’s nomination was largely procedural since convention rules call for nominations for each candidate that passes the delegate threshold. Even though Sanders rescinded his candidacy, he netted enough delegates during the primary to qualify.

United Auto Workers union president Bob King was the first to nominate Sanders.

On Twitter shortly after her appearance, Ocasio-Cortez wished Biden well.
"I extend my deepest congratulations to @JoeBiden - let’s go win in November”.

Originally Posted by jdandns

Calm down, old man.
That was standard convention procedure.
Have you never watched one before?
Her remarks were pre-approved, and not a surprise to anyone.
She was seconding Sanders' nomination after a different speaker initially called for it.

You honestly thought she went "rogue" and made that up right there on the spot, didn't you?

Yikes.

https://www.aol.com/article/news/202...-dnc/24593736/

From the above:
Ocasio-Cortez’s nomination was largely procedural since convention rules call for nominations for each candidate that passes the delegate threshold. Even though Sanders rescinded his candidacy, he netted enough delegates during the primary to qualify.

United Auto Workers union president Bob King was the first to nominate Sanders.

On Twitter shortly after her appearance, Ocasio-Cortez wished Biden well.
"I extend my deepest congratulations to @JoeBiden - let’s go win in November”.

Yep, my bad but let's not pretend I'm the only one who was a bit surprised. There were plenty of articles that popped up last night and confused twitter users on both sides of the aisle.
Regardless, the optics are still hilarious.
Bernie/AOC given a minute to win it!

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[cnewby]

Originally Posted by JeremyNick

It’s a simple question. You going to accept the eager or tuck your tail between your legs?

I mean, if you’re going to run your mouth, do it.

Otherwise go back to your safe space.

Its getting hilarious to watch him completely avoid this.

[JeremyNick]

Originally Posted by TheHeel

Yup!

Here you go skippy. Take a break.

[carlo16]

Originally Posted by JeremyNick

Do you believe in the abominable snowman too?

Thats offensive. Snowperson.

[Brobocop]

Originally Posted by JeremyNick

Do you always white knight for trolls?

As far as I'm concerned, the majority of the people in this thread are trolls. They are trying to get a rise out of the other side. There probably hasn't been a legit discussion of trying to understand each other's side since the thread started. I was just offering my opinion.

[tpeichel34]

Originally Posted by alpine

Why in the Hell is the USPS removing Letter Sorting Machines to remove 10% of overall sorting capacity for letters? Is this supposed to improve service?

Supposedly 671 sorting machines have been removed since Post Master General Dejoy took over. There was nothing wrong with them. A number of these sorting machines possibly have been junked & cannot be put back into service. These sorting machines cost millions to purchase.

Supposedly? Anything to back that up?

[tpeichel34]

Originally Posted by Astros19

I can't wait to see how this gets spun. Not sure which I'm more anxious for, responses here or the Dem leaders.
Either way, it's going to be Bigly hilarious.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

I’ve always had suspicions that AOC is a Trump plant.

[Jgil316]

Originally Posted by tpeichel34

I’ve always had suspicions that AOC is a Trump plant.

AOC is .... well, a moron.

I believe you and I can agree on that

[Hootiefish]

Originally Posted by tpeichel34

Supposedly? Anything to back that up?

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/16/polit...der/index.html

That article specifically mentions the 671 number. If CNN doesn't tickle your fancy, there are numerous articles from local news stations speaking with postal personnel about the removal of equipment. A dozen in Mass, 10 in Detroit, four in San Antonio, et al.

For all of the dumb sh!t that Trump has said and done over the past few years, I don't think he's done or said anything dumber as when he tried to gaslight the public the other day by tweeting out "Save the Post Office!"

He's literally the one that has been trying to kill it for the last few years, either through his actions or his comments. It's his crony that is exacerbating an already bad situation.

Someone needs to punch him in the balls every time he does something stupid. It's the only way he'll learn.

[cnewby]

where'd heelie go?

[TheHeel]

[discostu]

As interesting as Trump v Biden can be, it's followed closely by McConnell v McGrath, Graham v Harrison and Collins v Gideon.

If the Senate flips (and I don't think it will at this point), it's going to make a lot of things interesting.

The McConnell seat appears to be the safest, but that is the most important to the GOP. He will go down as one of the most adept politicians in the modern era and he is imperative to everything Trump will hope to accomplish if Trump wins reelection.

[tpeichel34]

Originally Posted by Hootiefish

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/16/polit...der/index.html

That article specifically mentions the 671 number. If CNN doesn't tickle your fancy, there are numerous articles from local news stations speaking with postal personnel about the removal of equipment. A dozen in Mass, 10 in Detroit, four in San Antonio, et al.

For all of the dumb sh!t that Trump has said and done over the past few years, I don't think he's done or said anything dumber as when he tried to gaslight the public the other day by tweeting out "Save the Post Office!"

He's literally the one that has been trying to kill it for the last few years, either through his actions or his comments. It's his crony that is exacerbating an already bad situation.

Someone needs to punch him in the balls every time he does something stupid. It's the only way he'll learn.

So these were planned moves and it did not say how many were getting scrapped and how many were just going to different locations. Kind of important information, no?

[tpeichel34]

Originally Posted by discostu

As interesting as Trump v Biden can be, it's followed closely by McConnell v McGrath, Graham v Harrison and Collins v Gideon.

If the Senate flips (and I don't think it will at this point), it's going to make a lot of things interesting.

The McConnell seat appears to be the safest, but that is the most important to the GOP. He will go down as one of the most adept politicians in the modern era and he is imperative to everything Trump will hope to accomplish if Trump wins reelection.

Trump would do be much better off replacing McConnell with someone that supports the America First agenda.

[TheFrenzy]

[TheHeel]

Originally Posted by tpeichel34

Trump would do be much better off replacing McConnell with someone that supports the America First agenda.

Putin

[oldgoldy97]

As I’ve gotten older I’ve noticed myself leaning more to the right. I just can’t vote for Trump because he’s too divisive and an overall bad person with minimal leadership capabilities.

Biden is an old goof.

I predict whoever wins dies in office from old age or some complication. So we need to figure out the best VP candidate.

Crap, hosed there, too