Blowout Cards Forums
AD Doejo

Go Back   Blowout Cards Forums > BLOWOUTS HOBBY TALK > BASEBALL

Notices

BASEBALL Post your Baseball Cards Hobby Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-11-2017, 05:13 PM   #51
Hollywood42
Member
 
Hollywood42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 39,477
Default

I don't really think it's even worth thinking about. The trade will never happen. Tigers need to rebuild, so why trade your best pitcher who is only 24? They should be trading just about everybody BUT Fulmer. He's going to command a high price because he's young, cheap, and a great player. But there's no reason the Cubs would drop Schwarber, a top 10 prospect, plus a rookie who has been playing quite well for a single pitcher who won't even help their team that much (they're much farther away at this point than 1 single pitcher fixing their team). Doesn't make any sense for them to give that much. The Tigers are right to place a sky high price tag on Fulmer, if they even trade him anyways, and the Cubs are right to stay far away. I don't think there's any point to thinking about that possible trade because it makes no sense from either side

Quote:
Originally Posted by jstasyk1121 View Post
so if both in your opinion are insane then what is the happy middle ground in your opinion? Schwarber and Happ?? no f'n shot they trade fulmer for just those two...no shot whatsoever...Kyle/Happ/eloy?? well now ur one top 100 prospect off from what i said...so i wouldnt say that is equally as crazy as just the 1for1...
__________________
Collecting the Twins
All my PC wants/haves available at hollywood42cards.com
Hollywood42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 05:29 PM   #52
base set
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 9,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheddar View Post

The Tigers are in an interesting situation.
yeah, as in the supposed ancient Chinese or 1930s English curse: "May you live in interesting times."


I will say this about the question Theo alledgedly put to Avila, re: Fulmer. When this news came out the other day it fairly surprised many Tigers fans, most of whom think Fulmer should be untouchable. No Tigers media commentator had dreamed up such a question either, previously, at least not in their public output.

But the fact that Avila was asked the question by another GM shows how other GMs would indeed consider trading Fulmer, given the Tigers' current situation.

The way I see the Tigers roster, they need a new C, 3B, corner OF, 2B, DH, CF and/or reserve OF, and reserve IF, presuming they don't re-sign JD Martinez. On the farm they might have a new OF on the way and a bunch more random pitching prospects (most of the last 2 draft classes, which also included 2 middle round Catchers each year I believe); whoop-eee. Their contracted starting Pitchers to pick from for the next few years is a big jumble of question marks outside of Fulmer and though they have one excellent bullpen piece (Shane Greene) and a few showing interesting potential right now, that is not enough to contend. But then with the starting 8 and the rotation they can likely field, they don't really need a bullpen anyway. They are not just a "couple key pieces" away from starting Michael Fulmer in ALCS game #1, 2019, as so many of their fans think.

They are also on track for their lowest attendance in 12 years right now and Michael Fulmer's WAR won't be far enough above that to change it, when he is surrounded by a whole lot of replacement players.


The Tigers' dark horse trade chip right now is Anibal Sanchez. JD Martinez, Alex Avila (sitting at 4th in MLB in OBP and 13th in MLB in OPS; not on the qualifying lists by only a dozen or so AB), and JD Wilson do give them one of the better hands at the table right now though, even without finding someone with deep enough pockets to get Fulmer. The idea of trading Verlander while paying some of his salary also kind of gives them the option to effectively purchase themselves some prospects/Rookies. If Avila Sr. blows this hand in the next 2.5 weeks somehow, ownership might as well fire the entire front office and start over from Ground Zero.
base set is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 05:47 PM   #53
Cheddar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by base set View Post
yeah, as in the supposed ancient Chinese or 1930s English curse: "May you live in interesting times."


I will say this about the question Theo alledgedly put to Avila, re: Fulmer. When this news came out the other day it fairly surprised many Tigers fans, most of whom think Fulmer should be untouchable. No Tigers media commentator had dreamed up such a question either, previously, at least not in their public output.

But the fact that Avila was asked the question by another GM shows how other GMs would indeed consider trading Fulmer, given the Tigers' current situation.

The way I see the Tigers roster, they need a new C, 3B, corner OF, 2B, DH, CF and/or reserve OF, and reserve IF, presuming they don't re-sign JD Martinez. On the farm they might have a new OF on the way and a bunch more random pitching prospects (most of the last 2 draft classes, which also included 2 middle round Catchers each year I believe); whoop-eee. Their contracted starting Pitchers to pick from for the next few years is a big jumble of question marks outside of Fulmer and though they have one excellent bullpen piece (Shane Greene) and a few showing interesting potential right now, that is not enough to contend. But then with the starting 8 and the rotation they can likely field, they don't really need a bullpen anyway. They are not just a "couple key pieces" away from starting Michael Fulmer in ALCS game #1, 2019, as so many of their fans think.

They are also on track for their lowest attendance in 12 years right now and Michael Fulmer's WAR won't be far enough above that to change it, when he is surrounded by a whole lot of replacement players.


The Tigers' dark horse trade chip right now is Anibal Sanchez. JD Martinez, Alex Avila (sitting at 4th in MLB in OBP and 13th in MLB in OPS; not on the qualifying lists by only a dozen or so AB), and JD Wilson do give them one of the better hands at the table right now though, even without finding someone with deep enough pockets to get Fulmer. The idea of trading Verlander while paying some of his salary also kind of gives them the option to effectively purchase themselves some prospects/Rookies. If Avila Sr. blows this hand in the next 2.5 weeks somehow, ownership might as well fire the entire front office and start over from Ground Zero.
I think you summed up the Tigers situation pretty well, and Avila has some really tough calls to make. They could simply try and re-tool the roster a little bit, or blow the whole thing up. They are going to have some bad money on the books, and that might be the deciding force if they can't get attendance figures up.
Cheddar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 07:09 PM   #54
lambeauleap87
Member
 
lambeauleap87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 24,744
Default

Fulmer is an outstanding talent and only twenty-four with five and a half years of team control. If anybody is going to acquire him, it's reasonable to assume that they'll have to pay a hefty price.

I hope the Twins/Royals are buyers and really leverage their futures this year. Indians are projected to run away with the division, so everybody else might as well blow their futures too.
__________________
I collect Packers, former Ohio State Buckeyes, Blue Jackets, and Cleveland Indians/Guardians.
lambeauleap87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 07:15 PM   #55
ntgm37
Member
 
ntgm37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 4,894
Default

Eduardo Rodriguez and Blake Swihart

For

Kyle Schwarber

Who says "no"?
__________________
Blowouts Resident Letter Carrier
USMC 02-06
Salt of the earth type
ntgm37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 07:22 PM   #56
Wrigs37
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 1,687
Default

awz50 in 3,2,1... Go!
__________________
-IG: @nice_cardboard
Wrigs37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 07:36 PM   #57
enbambam6986
Member
 
enbambam6986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12,472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammyjankis View Post
This will sound blasphemous, but I hope the Rangers can move Darvish for some prospects. Maybe Profar and a mid-level prospect for a bullpen arm.
Move Darvish AND get a bullpen arm? What? Are you a buyer or seller
enbambam6986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 07:53 PM   #58
Wrigs37
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 1,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enbambam6986 View Post
Move Darvish AND get a bullpen arm? What? Are you a buyer or seller
I'd love for the Cubs to acquire Darvish and Sign him after this year... That's the move I'm rooting for. I'm not sure what it would cost... Hopefully at a discount because of the rental factor...
__________________
-IG: @nice_cardboard
Wrigs37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 07:59 PM   #59
enbambam6986
Member
 
enbambam6986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12,472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrigs37 View Post
I'd love for the Cubs to acquire Darvish and Sign him after this year... That's the move I'm rooting for. I'm not sure what it would cost... Hopefully at a discount because of the rental factor...
It's funny that a full year of Paul George gets you nothing, but a half season of Darvish would cost you your top prospects.
enbambam6986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 08:02 PM   #60
awz50
Member
 
awz50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New Hampshire>>>Arizona>>>>Florida
Posts: 33,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntgm37 View Post
Eduardo Rodriguez and Blake Swihart

For

Kyle Schwarber

Who says "no"?
Hell no
__________________
Collecting Baseball Hof Autographs 248/351
Blowouts Official Red Sox face of the franchise
Eduardo Rodriguez Super Collector
awz50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 08:02 PM   #61
awz50
Member
 
awz50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New Hampshire>>>Arizona>>>>Florida
Posts: 33,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrigs37 View Post
awz50 in 3,2,1... Go!
__________________
Collecting Baseball Hof Autographs 248/351
Blowouts Official Red Sox face of the franchise
Eduardo Rodriguez Super Collector
awz50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 08:08 PM   #62
RelicCollector
Member
 
RelicCollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,500
Default

I really hope the Nats get Zach Britton. If not, I would settle with David Robertson. I prefer a guy with closer experience, not just a good reliever. However, we still need good relievers. How about we get 1 true closer and 1 or 2 good 7th/8th guys. Let's go!
RelicCollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 09:06 PM   #63
Wrightfan85
Member
 
Wrightfan85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,460
Default

As a Mets fan, I'd like to get a nice prospect for Addison Reed. Can really help a team out of the pen.
Wrightfan85 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 09:31 PM   #64
base set
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 9,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RelicCollector View Post
I really hope the Nats get Zach Britton. If not, I would settle with David Robertson. I prefer a guy with closer experience, not just a good reliever. However, we still need good relievers. How about we get 1 true closer and 1 or 2 good 7th/8th guys. Let's go!
what will the Nats be trading?
base set is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 09:34 PM   #65
Tarheelsfan2012
Member
 
Tarheelsfan2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by base set View Post
what will the Nats be trading?
You'd figure they have to give up Soto, Feede or Carter Kieboom to get a closer.
__________________
Current Filling BO GB's-TBD
http://sportscardalbum.com/u/jdetter23
Tarheelsfan2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 09:45 PM   #66
cnewby
Member
 
cnewby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: MI
Posts: 18,184
Default

Anyone see what inning Quintana was on display tonight? I mustve missed it.
cnewby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 11:02 PM   #67
Homerun
Member
 
Homerun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,798
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnewby View Post
Anyone see what inning Quintana was on display tonight? I mustve missed it.
I didn't see "legitimate ace" Masahiro Tanaka pitch tonight either.
__________________
Collector of White Sox autographs and blue refractors.
Blowout Redrafter's Dynasty Fantasy League Inaugural World Series Champion!
Homerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 12:42 AM   #68
CoolG
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rman112 View Post
Cubs fans delusionally think that Schwarber is worth something right now. Yes, I'm sure the Tigers are interested in a .180 hitting strikeout machine who can't play the field, in return for a young starter with a career 3.11 ERA in the AL.. who's making peanuts and under control for years.
Schwarber pretty much delivered them the World Series title last year ending the 100 plus year draught. So of course fans still hold him in high regard. Let's be realistic he's not a .180 hitter or a .450 hitter (WS stats)
Guy is a legit 37 / 100 .275 type guy and still has legit trade value in most GM's eyes.
CoolG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 01:37 AM   #69
JackThree
Member
 
JackThree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 4,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homerun View Post
I didn't see "legitimate ace" Masahiro Tanaka pitch tonight either.
LMAO!
JackThree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 01:54 AM   #70
jstasyk1121
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolG View Post
Schwarber pretty much delivered them the World Series title last year ending the 100 plus year draught. So of course fans still hold him in high regard. Let's be realistic he's not a .180 hitter or a .450 hitter (WS stats)
Guy is a legit 37 / 100 .275 type guy and still has legit trade value in most GM's eyes.
Actually u are flat out guessing here...he is more of a .180 hitter than .275 hitter...since he has been a .180 hitter for like 80% of his mlb career to this point...

I don't know how in the world with a straight face u can say he is a legit .275/35hr/100rbi guy....that is basically g.stanton...
jstasyk1121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 06:36 AM   #71
myerscards
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 9,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood42 View Post
Wait... We're talking about Michael Fulmer for Schwarber and some prospects? Yeah right....


For the Twins, we still need some pitching. However, we aren't true contenders this year and should stay true to our timeline that really starts in another year or two. We aren't there yet, but we're getting closer. I would absolutely hate to see us buy a half season rental, but if we can move a prospect or two, even some of our better ones, for a solid pitcher that is under contract for a few years, I'm on board. We could also use some bullpen help, as could just about every team in the MLB. All that said, I don't see the Twins making any major moves this year, and that's probably alright
They are 2and a half games out. Then what is a contender? They aren't real contenders because they never make big moves. ( Oh yeah they did they acquired Bartolo Colon in both ways ).
myerscards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 07:29 AM   #72
cnewby
Member
 
cnewby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: MI
Posts: 18,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homerun View Post
I didn't see "legitimate ace" Masahiro Tanaka pitch tonight either.
He took the night off to get healthy for the second half. Ya know, since the Yankees are actually in the playoff hunt and all.
cnewby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 07:55 AM   #73
Devourment
Banned - PBM
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 89
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolG View Post
Schwarber pretty much delivered them the World Series title last year ending the 100 plus year draught. So of course fans still hold him in high regard. Let's be realistic he's not a .180 hitter or a .450 hitter (WS stats)
Guy is a legit 37 / 100 .275 type guy and still has legit trade value in most GM's eyes.
Uh.....what?
Devourment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 08:05 AM   #74
Craiggysanford
Member
 
Craiggysanford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Southern Vermont
Posts: 7,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bajcards4215 View Post
I'm terrified Dombrowski will trade Devers for :shudder: Todd Frazier.
I would be irate and would prob go on the dark web, get some anthrax, put said anthrax inside an envelope, send said anthrax laden envelope to his office, and wait for the FBI to show up at my house because I just POSTED my plan on BO. LOL. Seriously though, I'd be pretty bummed and would prob stop collecting cards. I lost A LOT on Moncada!!! Idk if the GF would be ok with me tanking on Devers too.
Craiggysanford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 08:10 AM   #75
roro17
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 6,261
Default

Degrom gonna go to the Stros
roro17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2019, Blowout Cards Inc.