2020 Politics Thread - Enter At Your Own Risk - RULES IN OP

[jjcan]

Originally Posted by Brobocop

That system already exists, it's called our voting process. Why are people looking for an issue when one doesn't exist?

Agree!

Maybe next time we should see if 2024 voters can just use Blowout's polling process but add who voted who and submit to the ballot polls.

Then we can say, no way can Blowout forums polls have fraud!

But I am sure. This would happen

• Multiple Accounts.
• Dead Blow Out members.
• Some one has no ID cannot log into the forum
  • I hit submit 3 days later..

Anyone post their MASK CASE breaks yet. I had to open 5 boxes at work today.. They were all BLUE!! no # ones.

[Brobocop]

Originally Posted by JustRachel

Because some believe our system isn't perfect and it could be better.

Do you think our system is perfect? Or is it merely "good enough" for you?

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

There is no perfect system. Again, how can it be better? How does a voter ID help things without creating a barrier to voting? We didn't have any issues with this until this year when more people voted by mail than in person. Maybe mail-in voting is the future. Maybe we should mail registered voters their ballots and they can bring it to a polling station blank and vote in person if they want. Obviously, you'd have to verify your identity on the mail-in ballot through either a state ID number or social security number.

[GeechQuest]

Originally Posted by JustRachel

Because some believe our system isn't perfect and it could be better.

Do you think our system is perfect? Or is it merely "good enough" for you?

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

Nothing is nor ever will be be perfect.

Even if it WAS perfect, those screaming fraud would still scream it.

[discostu]

Originally Posted by JustRachel

There is some serious "us/them" stuff going on for you there.

Step back for a moment and look at it from the point of a neutral observer. If even one illegally cast vote is counted, that's a problem. If even one legally cast vote is not counted, that is also a problem.

Widespread, schmidespread. Doesn't matter. Every legal vote counts every time or we need to fix it.

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

I am neutral. I don't believe we need new laws or requirements for things that haven't ever been proven to be an issue. It's nothing but "what if" and "it could" questions and statements.

I'm also not dumb enough to think that any law (voter ID or otherwise) could stop 100% of those who are willing to commit some sort of vote casting fraud.

So if you're looking at going from virtually non-existent to a proven zero, you're chasing a dragon.

[Boo]

Originally Posted by discostu

I am neutral. I don't believe we need new laws or requirements for things that haven't ever been proven to be an issue. It's nothing but "what if" and "it could" questions and statements.

I'm also not dumb enough to think that any law (voter ID or otherwise) could stop 100% of those who are willing to commit some sort of vote casting fraud.

So if you're looking at going from virtually non-existent to a proven zero, you're chasing a dragon.

I don't think anyone in here would say you are neutral.

[NeedChapmans]

Originally Posted by Hootiefish

Except that it is one more thing that this administration is straight-up lying about and trying to take credit for.

No reason to lie at this point, yet they cannot help themselves.

Well, now that Pfizer is admitting it's part of the operation, are you done pretending to know what you're talking about?

[lionsfan20]

Originally Posted by Hootiefish

S.S. Dumbass

Lol class acts in here after the election. Shocking. Win or lose the left rage and act like juveniles in here.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[Hootiefish]

Originally Posted by NeedChapmans

Well, now that Pfizer is admitting it's part of the operation, are you done pretending to know what you're talking about?

Forgive me for trusting the original Pfizer statement rather than this administration.

[Hootiefish]

Originally Posted by lionsfan20

Lol class acts in here after the election. Shocking. Win or lose the left rage and act like juveniles in here.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

In all fairness, we were class acts before the election too.

[Brobocop]

Originally Posted by lionsfan20

Lol class acts in here after the election. Shocking. Win or lose the left rage and act like juveniles in here.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Um, the President is literally calling everything that doesn't favor him fake and fraudulent. Half his Tweets have warnings on them about being false or misleading. He just fired his Defense Secretary for no apparent reason. He refuses to even acknowledge that he might have lost. But it's those on the left that are juvenile.

[yanksfan1]

McConnell goes to floor of the senate to encourage legal challenges right after meeting with AG Bill Barr. They're gonna try to cook something up.

[Hootiefish]

Originally Posted by Brobocop

Um, the President is literally calling everything that doesn't favor him fake and fraudulent. Half his Tweets have warnings on them about being false or misleading. He just fired his Defense Secretary for no apparent reason. He refuses to even acknowledge that he might have lost. But it's those on the left that are juvenile.

Forgive them, they know not what they do.

It's probably a lot to realize that the person you've defended for the last four years is as crazy and unhinged as the rest of us have been saying.

[cnewby]

Originally Posted by NeedChapmans

Well, now that Pfizer is admitting it's part of the operation, are you done pretending to know what you're talking about?

[lionsfan20]

Originally Posted by Hootiefish

In all fairness, we were class acts before the election too.

Haha true. Apperantly getting supsended doesn't help.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[Hootiefish]

Originally Posted by lionsfan20

Haha true. Apperantly getting supsended doesn't help.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I got suspended for using a bad word. It's not like I threatened anyone.

[lietuvalabas]

Originally Posted by NeedChapmans

Well, now that Pfizer is admitting it's part of the operation, are you done pretending to know what you're talking about?

so what does this actually mean NC? im too stupid.

[NeedChapmans]

Originally Posted by Hootiefish

Forgive me for trusting the original Pfizer statement rather than this administration.

Wrong again. Their initial statement was the PR release Pfizer made on July 22nd which clearly said they were part of the program.

https://investors.pfizer.com/investo...2/default.aspx

[NeedChapmans]

Originally Posted by lietuvalabas

so what does this actually mean NC? im too stupid.

It means that the government agreed to buy 100 million doses of the vaccine from Pfizer for a cost of $1.95 billion; and the government reserved the right to acquire an additional 500 million doses at the same agreed upon price.

If Pfizer wanted the payday and the star power for creating the vaccine, they had to fund the R&D themselves.

[Hootiefish]

Originally Posted by NeedChapmans

Wrong again. Their initial statement was the PR release Pfizer made on July 22nd which clearly said they were part of the program.

https://investors.pfizer.com/investo...2/default.aspx

According to this article, two people at Pfizer stated they did not take federal money and were not part of Operation Warp Speed:

https://www.newsweek.com/pfizer-covi...-pence-1546024

But yes, I was wrong for not believing the Trump administration.

[NeedChapmans]

Originally Posted by Hootiefish

According to this article, two people at Pfizer stated they did not take federal money and were not part of Operation Warp Speed:

https://www.newsweek.com/pfizer-covi...-pence-1546024

But yes, I was wrong for not believing the Trump administration.

Newsweek is trash. 20 years since it was a serious publication, you may as well post from the Enquirer.

And no; you were wrong because you were wrong.

[lietuvalabas]

Originally Posted by NeedChapmans

It means that the government agreed to buy 100 million doses of the vaccine from Pfizer for a cost of $1.95 billion; and the government reserved the right to acquire an additional 500 million doses at the same agreed upon price.

If Pfizer wanted the payday and the star power for creating the vaccine, they had to fund the R&D themselves.

thanks as always sir.

[Hootiefish]

Originally Posted by NeedChapmans

Newsweek is trash. 20 years since it was a serious publication, you may as well post from the Enquirer.

And no; you were wrong because you were wrong.

Christ, do you people not like any news publication? Does it have to be OAN or NewsMax to be accepted?

And you can't even take someone admitting they were wrong without some little jab.

[cnewby]

Originally Posted by Hootiefish

Christ, do you people not like any news publication? Does it have to be OAN or NewsMax to be accepted?

And you can't even take someone admitting they were wrong without some little jab.

trigger much?

[wood minis]

Originally Posted by NeedChapmans

It means that the government agreed to buy 100 million doses of the vaccine from Pfizer for a cost of $1.95 billion; and the government reserved the right to acquire an additional 500 million doses at the same agreed upon price.

If Pfizer wanted the payday and the star power for creating the vaccine, they had to fund the R&D themselves.

That's enough to vaccinate those who voted for Biden or those who voted for Trump given it's two shots.

[Hootiefish]

Originally Posted by cnewby

trigger much?

Please allow me to prostrate myself before you, oh great and powerful one. I shall never speak ill of the truthfulness of the soon-to-be-former Trump administration again. Nor shall I post a link from a news source prior to having NC and a team of right wing loons vet it for its truthiness.

Does that work?