![]() |
|
|||||||
| BASEBALL Post your Baseball Cards Hobby Talk |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Bowman Scout
|
Per Ken Rosenthal. Would have made him the highest paid player in baseball.
![]() Looks as though the Nats' farm system will soon be getting a whole lot better. They're entertaining trades. https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/...0mm-offer.html
__________________
Impervious to baiting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
I'm just curious that if they pull off a trade, just how insane of a haul they get. I mean Soto is the player you get multiple top prospects and immediate major league impact players for.
I would trade basically anything on the Yankees for him honestly (not that we can afford him since we have to pay Judge, and are paying stupid monster deals to Cole/Stanton/Chapman already)
__________________
Twitter - @seth_murphy8 PCs - Ryan Callahan, Reggie Lewis, Funko Pops (a little), a few other things that catch my eye |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
Trade Trout. Then bring Soto to the Angels!
__________________
"Watson alone sells for over $20" https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1182760 If you reply with...."last one on eBay sold for this"...then you should have bought it on eBay. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 41,375
|
Good. The franchise isn’t committed to winning. Get him to a winner.
__________________
I love PSA! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
Not a good time for Soto to turn down 440 million given how awful his numbers are right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 7,603
|
There's basically zero chance that $440 million number is present value. The Nationals are notorious for putting tons of deferred money into contracts. I wouldn't be surprised if it was something like $300 million plus $140 million deferred for a long time to bring the "true" contract number under $400 million.
Good for him for betting on himself. He'd get $500 million on the open market |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: TX
Posts: 2,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,332
|
Rosenthal said the offer did not include any deferred money
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 7,603
|
Awful numbers? What? He's 7th in the NL with an .895 OPS, on pace for 35 HRs, has the best BB/K rate in the league, #3 in the NL in xwOBA. If that's awful, what's not awful???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 7,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
I can still remember Pete Rose, on the top step of the dugout screaming, “F*** you, Shakespeare. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 7,603
|
Eh looks like it was essentially a lifetime contract offer. 15 years to take him to 38. He's worth far more than 30 a year averaged out over that timeline
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
|
Right, his babip is 60 points below his career average so there's chance he's getting unlucky. Every team should be trying to trade for him while they have the chance. Unless we find out he's been juicing his first 5 years of his career, there's little to no chance any prospect performs like he does. This feels like a win no matter what your team gives up.
__________________
I can still remember Pete Rose, on the top step of the dugout screaming, “F*** you, Shakespeare. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Always Buying: Vintage and Tobacco Cards Follow us on Twitter AND Instagram: @Cavaliercards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 15,954
|
Has his camp given any sense at what they want? Does he want 400 for 10? More?
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,132
|
He’s playing just as good as he was last year. He has essentially the exact same xwOBA, he’s just been fairly unlucky until a couple weeks ago. And if not playing well involves you having a .405 on base as a 24 year old, well…that’s how you turn down this contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
|
He has 2.5 years until UFA. How much is that worth if you’re trading for him? Washington will want either major league talent on team friendly deals, or a boatload of almost mlb ready prospects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 496
|
Smart move, he will still make more then enough money and won’t be stuck on a dog crap team like trout.
I bet if mike trout could go back and sign with a good franchise and and have a chance to win for a little less money he’d be all over that right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 41,375
|
He’s going to get something like $55-60M in arbitration the next two years. Then he is a free agent. So 15/440 values his free agency at age 26 at 13/380 (29.2). Trout got 12/426 (35.5) at age 28. Not clear if Soto/Boras wants one contract that takes him to age 40, or if he wants another crack at free agency around age 30-32. Judging on how Soto has bet on himself, I’d say second contract.
__________________
I love PSA! |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,132
|
Dodgers got two months of a Cy Young level pitcher and 1.5 years of elite Trea Turner for two really good but not great prospects that were basically Major League ready.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
|
I would think a deal would have to include an extension in place but also a third team. You would basically be looking at hader + frelick Mitchell turang chourio and then hader to flipped for Mayer bello yorke downs
Just making up a scenario. But I think that’s the haul it would take. Two teams 3 top 5 guys from each
__________________
Texans Future Super Bowl Champions |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,064
|
As a Nats fan this is tough. On one hand, I want Soto around as long as possible. On the other hand, the Trout experience in Anaheim underlines that an all-time great alone does not make for a good team. And there's always risk of injury or other decline.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|