![]() |
|
|
#101 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 736
|
Quote:
I totally get your anger njsg, it's a different game now. If you have a couple hundred or thousand a month though....retail to scratch the itch, singles for a sweet collection and don't pay the PSA 10 tax. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Member
|
Should really call them Greek auctions at this point with how they're giving it to collectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 14,070
|
My bet here is Topps Chrome NBA First Day Issue boxes.
__________________
www.blowoutbuzz.com >>><<< Got something cool or interesting that might be worth a story? Know someone whose collection could be profiled? Send me a DM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 12,366
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,419
|
Quote:
For one why would any of the larger direct buyers buy any boxes or cases during the auction? If they know their already guaranteed allotment, they will pay the lowest or under the lowest price they sell for why would any of them take a risk and pay more during the auction? So, by them not buying right there you are already guaranteeing every product goes for a lower price. If it is indeed the model of everyone pays the lowest price of sell out why would you hold back product to then sell what's held back for 75% of that final cost instead of the entire 100% during the auction? The way Panini went about selling hobby the last 6 years and FOTL since late 2021 was clearly stupidity and/or corruption. Topps seems like they may be trying to do something that is not only in their best interest but the interest of the average buyer and the long term of the hobby. Maybe Im being too optimistic that they will auction at least 90%. Either way, as I've said a million times, I'll take any type of auction format over how Topps had been selling their in demand products and hope it's a fair one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 12,366
|
Quote:
Topps doesn't want to pay sales agents to sell product -- they want to sell it more efficiently directly to consumers and dealers. That's where the auction format comes in. They won't sell it all via auction because they want to retain control over distribution -- they want product being sold via group breaks on Fanatics Live. The auction format is also a way to diversify how Topps sells their products -- they don't want to rely on one model. They are experimenting and leaving their options open. They also want direct accounts to know product can be sold without them -- it's a power move. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,419
|
Quote:
Direct accounts would still have access to buy every other product not being auctioned at a money tree price. Which is going to be the vast majority of products. If they don't like it they can leave. There are thousands of people that would gladly take their spot. We don't know for sure the auction format but a long time member on here said his shop owner heard this info direct from Topps and its the format where every buyer will pay the sell out price. So if you're correct they aren't going to pay the average price. They are going to at worst pay the lowest price and most likely less. Again that lowers the auction sell out price because those guys aren't going to want it to sell out at a higher price and jack up their cost of their allotment. they wouldn't even participant in auctions unless their allotment was basically non existent. Topps/Fanatics has been paying sales agents for years. If they wanted to retain complete control over distribution they had it. The model was hold back most product and sell at a higher price under the table usually after a product was way higher in price. Really the only products it didn't work on were the ones that weren't in high demand. I can't think of a single high demand one that strategy hasn't worked on. We all know at this point one way or another breakers are going to get this product and break on Fanatics live regardless of the distribution model. Lol a power move?!? If every single direct buyer dropped out tomorrow you would have thousands BEGGING to take their spots. Panini didn't change their model of hobby distribution for the better part of a decade even though they would have had millions lining up to pay full MSRP versus the 75%ish Panini was charging for the majority of hobby products. The only thing we will agree on is they are experimenting. I think the way this will go they will change it very quickly or get rid of it completely. That's if it is the format where everyone only pays the lowest price. The only time they ever did this that product sold out at the floor price. They should go the Panini auction route. That or a blind bid type system where everyone would have 24 hours to put in their bids and quantities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,528
|
Here’s how the Topps website defines Dutch Auction which is different than the Luber/Zerocool method described upthread.
From: https://www.topps.com/pages/dutch-auction-terms Effective as of May 18, 2023 “Dutch Auction. In a “Dutch” auction, products will be made available at a “starting price” when the auction begins which is the highest possible price for a bid. The price will then reduce by specified dollar amounts in increments of time (e.g., $25 every 5 minutes) until the product is sold out or until the auction price reaches the specified “floor” price which is the lowest possible price possible bid price. Bidding price is determined at the moment an item is added to the cart, not when checkout is complete. Bid checkouts completed after the product has sold out or after auction has ended may be rejected or later cancelled. We may limit the number of boxes or cases per transaction and/or number of transactions per customer.” |
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
"I added X to my cart at 11:05 but the price didn't change/lower, when I checked out I was charged the higher price but topps totally has my back right?!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 12,366
|
Quote:
Sure, Topps could easily replace any direct account, but they still need the dealers to buy product. Having the auction format ensures Topps has alternative methods of selling product, but it's best paired with the dealer network -- they are complementary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 12,366
|
The auction format is potentially superior to the EQL format for Topps because the auction format allows for the possibility of buyers paying higher prices to get first crack at new product -- EQL sold product at a preset price.
The higher auction prices can then be used to set direct pricing -- Topps doesn't have to hold back product to wait for prices to reset on the secondary market. |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,419
|
Quote:
You now have Topps Basketball hobby selling for double what they pay. It's going to be as printed as basically any NBA product. I still remember everyone being pissed that presale for 18-19 Prizm Basketball hobby was double MSRP. That's because before then basically nothing had been double MSRP. How much do you think Topps Chrome Basketball hobby will sell above MSRP? Im sure more than almost every product prior to 6-7 years ago. Again, if these dealers think being able to sell the majority of products for MSRP or well over MSRP isn't good enough if you can't get the most likely maybe 15% of products considered premium for a money tree price then say goodbye. At least thousands of people willing to take your spot if the margins aren't good enough. I'd love to know how much more profit Panini would have made cutting off the money tree price even on just their top 15%-20% of premium hobby products the last 6 years. I did the math a few years ago and for only a few years NT, Prizm, and Flawless hobby the difference versus selling it all for 75%ish of immediate market value was several hundreds of millions of dollars. That was only 3 products, for 2 sports, and only for maybe a 3 year period. There is a reason no other business on earth operates this way. Why would any company sell their average products that are mid to high end and very easy to immediately resell for a fraction of immediate resale value? Literally not 1 other company has operated like these 2 have at certain points this decade. At least Topps finally found a reason to do over the last year or so with holding back a ton to sell at way higher prices later partially from creating artificial scarcity. Any other business for very obvious reasons isn't going to allow the secondary seller to make by far the biggest piece of the pie on mid to high end easy to resell products. If you want to talk about cheap hard to sell products like someone brought up years ago with like cables or stupid crap no one is getting rich on ok. Every single person with a big allotment from Panini and Topps this decade has made retirement money to provide no service that countless millions wouldn't have for a fraction of that profit margin. Last edited by mossoholic; 11-15-2025 at 06:25 PM. Reason: edit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 12,366
|
TC basketball sold out at preset pricing of $700 for Jumbo boxes and $370 for hobby boxes.
How much higher or lower would prices have been with a Dutch-style auction? I understand that it was a limited drop to set initial pricing and create FOMO, but I'm wondering if Topps actually left a lot of money on the table or not. And I get that breakers and dealers can outspend individuals, and that those on BO want to have a chance at getting some boxes to flip or open -- this isn't what this is about. Last edited by fabiani12333; 11-20-2025 at 09:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 12,366
|
Would prices for TC basketball have reached $1,000 for jumbo and $650 for hobby using Dutch auction?
Being the first to market carries a built-in premium, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22,045
|
Quote:
eBay has so many jumbos that sold for over $1k. Box flipper bois would have been left out, likely by choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22,045
|
Honestly, topps should only make one case of any product available to the public “just for show”.
The rest they can trickle out as supply disappears, particularly for endless demand products. Jack up the second, third and fourth wave prices, then blackmail breakers to take them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 12,366
|
Quote:
Otherwise, they could just sell everything publicly in phases to the highest bidders -- no need for sales agents. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22,045
|
Quote:
The single collector public is of really little concern to them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#121 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22,045
|
The perception that everyone is getting a chance to get product is all they need to keep you enticed.
The reality is even large retail hobby stores are getting skunked because they aren’t vital to the fanatics business plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#122 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 12,366
|
Quote:
In that scenario, the product is being widely advertised to consumers, creating a demand and the perception of wide availability, but it's actually frustratingly hard to get at a reasonable price due to the method of distribution -- everything is being funneled through breakers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22,045
|
Quote:
Do they really have any incentive to leave any meat on the bone for middlemen? Let them have a single slice of cake. A really thin slice. Let the conjured demand do the rest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 4,431
|
One of the many ways they manipulate the market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 | |||
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 5,375
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Would either of you buy boxes/cases of the new products from Fanatics, anyway - if they were priced more cheaply? I don’t see may positive comments from either of you about new products - whether it’s the price, content, distribution, etc… |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|