![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
At the small show in my area last weekend, actually had guys looking through my case at my PSA graded black and white (hobby sp's) and commenting on how they had those "sepias" already...lol what? Its there on the label, and the cards don't look anything like sepias (easy to tell the difference in person, much easier than trying to decipher an ebay photo with bad lighting...)
I will admit, I wasn't as aware of the difference between the parallels until last year either. I got told a few times that what I was listing on ebay was incorrect, and it took a few rounds of messages for me to figure it out. I eventually admitted my lack of knowledge. I started researching print runs and odds, and hobby twitter helped to sort out what was common and what wasnt. There is a such a big difference between retail and hobby with stadium club baseball, that the common collector or flipper doesn't understand and ultimately, it leads to rare and tough to grade cards being overlooked (value unappreciated) when they truly are hard to find and nearly impossible to get in top condition. Topps chose not to use a serial number variations in the 2022 set for b&w and sepias, and to add to the confusion, left card numbers the same across the base stadium club set, and the chrome set (each with refractor parallels, image variations, and other unreasonable parallels). The set will be iconic, with Wander, JRod and Witt rookies, and some really great photos of Ohtani and Judge, but if everything mentioned earlier wasnt bad enough, PSA has been mislabeling tons of cards, and giving random beginner collectors the impression they have low pop cards (the research team cant tell the difference between a base ohtani from scc, and a chrome parallel from sc, due to them having the same #1 in both sets). I guess, as a collector of the hobby exclusive black and whites, and a fan of the shorter print run refractors from scc, its frustrating to see people laugh when you explain to them the low pops on certain cards aren't a joke, and no one is asking for the moon on cards, they really are that hard to find and that hard to grade. Stadium club is expanding their parallels, not something Im a fan of, but the photography and *mostly* on card autos in the sets are great, and why I prefer SC and SCC to other flagship sets. Anyone else see where I'm coming from or think the same? Long term, would be great to see hard to find SC variations and parallels (or high grade / low pop cards) get the love (and value) they deserve. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 4,568
|
Those early Topps Finest cards, I still to this day can't spot the 'refractors' and probably have some sitting in commons boxes.
Never heard of a Sepia. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
When they make them impossible to find, they become a tree falling in the forest when nobody is around.
__________________
Go Royals!! #RoyalsIn2015 <---It Happened!! Sometimes it is astounding that we are able to persist in a world so full of morons.#TEAMZinck |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
I once bought a gold minted chrome parallel that someone listed as a sepia.
I've picked up quite a few wave refractors that weren't labeled as such. Easiest way to distinguish between SC / SCC cards that share a card # and photo is by using the CMP code on the back. Can be tough to read the tiny print though. I probably won't be able to read in in another 5-10 years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 26,643
|
I got this “sepia” at a nice discount a couple weeks back (it’s not my first b&w found this way)
![]() I’ve also purchased several gold minted that were also labeled “sepia” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 26,643
|
Quote:
Maybe stick an actual sepia parallel in the case next to the b&w to make the distinction more obvious? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: SF
Posts: 94
|
What are the odds on the hobby vs retail b/w vs sephia for 2022?
Overall agree with what you are saying. 2021 SC had the white on the Stadium Club Logo and serial number to denote the image variation. Took me a month+ to figure it out and went through my base and found 3 vlad jr, biaz, snell. Now they are my favorite image variations to PC for that set. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,132
|
The whole Stadium Club franchise is currently a bit of a mess. Between just way too many parallels to the point where even really rare ones aren't that desirable and the photography taking quite a step back, it's getting a little tired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Not sure on sepia print run, but it’s retail and hobby and are fairly common. 4 per blaster when I was opening boxes… B&W are hobby only, with a print run of about 63 per card for the 2022 set. Odds were 1:48 hobby packs, so 1 in every 3 hobby boxes on average. I like the scarcity of the parallel, mainly. Just wish they were easier to recognize, for the common collector. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
I agree. But after grabbing the more rare B&W parallels for 2022, I’ve been going back a few years, trying to find ohtani, Acuna, judge, etc. and calculating print runs. More enjoyable than losing out on hobby boxes over and over. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2025
Posts: 28
|
Does anyone know the print run of the black foil in 2018. Can't seem to find it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2025
Posts: 28
|
Actually, also the print run for the red foil for 2018 also?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Doesn't have actual print runs, but it does have pack odds. Neither the red foil (5-6 per hobby box) or the black foils (2 per hobby box) were very rare in 2018, so I can't imagine either print run is low. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 138
|
Since they are trying to make parallels consistent across products, how bad are they going to overhaul the stadium club parallels, if it even exists for 2025? Will they turn the common red foil parallels into red /5? Will gold minted become /50?
I don’t think changing the serial numbers would bother me, but a lot of the 2024 parallels looked hideous… Hope they fix that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,242
|
I just want Stadium Club released. Parallels are just artificial value to make people think they pulled something wild out of their dud box. I'll depend on the breakers to get the singles I want out into the marketplace.
__________________
Wanted Dead or Alive! 1. 1997 Bowman's Best Jose Cruz, Jr Atomic Refractor Autograph 2. 1997 SPx Jose Cruz, Jr. Grand Finale /50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram - serial_numbers_matter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 761
|
Quote:
It doesn't help that hobby boxes are around $300 because of the strong rookie class. No one breaking it, no one buying it. Was really hoping there would be a Black Friday deal somewhere but it never happened.
__________________
Collecting: Mookie Betts, David Ortiz, Pedro Martinez, Dustin Pedroia, Tim Lincecum, Buster Posey, Vlad Sr. IG: sfosoxfan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
|
If there's one thing I know,putting the 2024 Stadium Club Chrome Refractor set has been an incredibly slow process. It was a bit easier when Chrome was a stand-alone product. I've seen a good amount of retail opened but not nearly as much hobby and compact.
__________________
20 year collector of Albert Pujols and I build parallel sets. RIP Topps Chrome Baseball Pink Refractors. Last edited by bblair_2002; 12-08-2025 at 12:34 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|