![]() |
|
|||||||
| GRADING For all grading talk - PSA, BGS, SGC, etc |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
Like the title says, is getting a card graded worth it if you don't intend to sell?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Vintage is whole different conversation. Card and condition. Also depends what you want for your PC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
In my case, I'm speaking of the 1989 Upper Deck Ken Griffey Jr., 1969 Topps Hank Aaron and 1965 Topps Carl Yastrzemski. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: CA
Posts: 5,192
|
If you truly don't intend to never sell the cards, then no...why give money away?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Vintage PSA and SCG due very well as far as resell. Pros/Cons on each company to get them graded. So potentially a crap shoot there depending on how much you want to invest into the grading compared to cards condition and/or what you think your long term goals are with the cards.
__________________
Blowouts Resident Wade Boggs Super Collector |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
I think this depends. Are they good enough to potentially get a 10? Then the answer could be yes if you want to make sure that you protect them and keep them that way. The Griffey I would say you'd probably be better off buying a 10 and selling that copy raw (reduces your risk of not getting the grade you want). There are a LOT of copies of it out in the wild, and a 9 probably doesn't mean much in the long run with the print run of that card. But, the other two, even if they are lower grade, it would be worthwhile just to seal them (IMO), but not at the length of time it takes PSA or the cost. I, personally, would get SGC to do them before they're no longer an option.
I have only graded for two reasons: some cards I sold recently went for FAR more than raw because of their high grades, being PSA 9s and 10s for really rare cards. The other reason is I have a rainbow that I plan to give to my daughter in my will, and whether she keeps it or not is up to her, but by that time it will be FAR easier to sell since the entire thing is graded. Also really fun to say I have two 1/1s of the same player from the same set (one base and one insert) that graded PSA 10s. I also know they are protected from everything but extreme damage (like fire). That said, I don't think this is something anyone else can answer for you, but that will hopefully give you enough information to help you make an informed decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
If you don't intend to sell, you're basically asking one of the below questions:
1) Is the "value added to me of holding the graded card worth more than the $20+ to grade" 2) "When I die, will the person having the card and selling it want it to be graded?" I don't know how we can possibly answer #1 for you. For #2, lookup PSA 6-8 values of the cards you're considering, and see if the value equation makes sense. If there's gray area, you can argue either way - 1) grade now because prices of grading will only go up in future, and better to get it encased now 2) Wait it out because who knows if people will value PSA or grading down the road |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
Very solid points thank you. These are the cards in question. I understand none of them are at the level of a 10.
![]()
Last edited by Burglekutt; 12-11-2025 at 12:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,167
|
For the Ken Griffey Jr. card, check the back. If the diamond hologram isn't perfectly centered within the hologram spot, it won't get a great grade. If the hologram is peeling, that too will greatly ding the grade, even if the card is otherwise perfect.
__________________
Sports Card Organizer Software for Mac & Windows www.InakaSoftware.com/SportsCardDatabase |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
|
I mean, SGC prices right now, why not? I graded some cards worth a dollar for my 2014 rainbow, just so that I had them encapsulated like the rest of it. If they were in really terrible shape (like 1s) I'd say it wasn't worth it, but those look clean enough to warrant a try at least. Personally, I do like the fact the cards I plan on passing on are encapsulated, even though the rest of my collection is not. These aren't 2025 no name rookies you're grading, so there will always be some value in them graded, even if they aren't 10s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
Thanks. I'll take a look and post a photo here ASAP to get other opinions. I've had this card in a screw down case since I got it in 1990 and it's never been taken out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: CA
Posts: 5,192
|
Screwdowns unfortunately can be bad for cards....can leave surface issues on the card (cards with noticeable surface issues pretty much get bumped down to a 6). The Griffey looks off center left/right. so no more than a 9...and the corners look a little soft...so my guess is an 8 at best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
|
Subscribed.
__________________
X & IG: rossisportcards. Bethel Johnson & A. Vinatieri. "A Goldin Shower of sorrow and regret." -ninjacookies (11/25/24) "never did, never will" - Delta5 (9/25/24) |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: VA
Posts: 8,829
|
I have a pack-pulled '89 UD Griffey that will get an 8 or maybe 9 from PSA...but most likely no better than an 8. I have reviewed the card condition several times in the past as I put together orders to send to PSA. Each time, I decide not to send it. Not worth it. Plus I like that its in the same top loader it has been in since ~1992 when my friend pulled it.
'89 UD Griffey sells for more as PSA-1/PSA-2/PSA-3 than it does as PSA-8. So your best bet is to keep it in your pocket for a few weeks...then send it to PSA.
__________________
In search of... 2018 Topps Chrome Update Max Scherzer #HMT77: Superfractor 2019 Topps Update Carter Kieboom #US109: Platinum |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Yaz looks like a VG-EX 4 or so to me because of the bottom right corner damage. The Aaron looks like a 6 because of the centering. Image makes it look like it's not cut properly (perpendicular). So it might not get a number grade at all because of being miscut, the ungraded type. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
|
As someone that grades a lot, these cards should not be graded. Grading will set you back $20 plus a card with shipping and you will not add this value to these cards. If these are your only three vintage type cards, the person inheriting these won't care any way. If you have a larger collection that is ungraded, Greg Morris cards will give you a higher return if you factor in grading fees. I don't like the argument you have to grade in case you die. As long as there is Greg Morris on eBay, you will be fine.
__________________
Always looking for rarer Rik Smits cards and cards from the 2014-15 Spectra Global Icons set. Send me a message! |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
It sounds like peace of mind is not a good reason to invest in getting at least these cards graded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
These are awesome cards, but there is no financial benefit in grading them. I would put them in new top loaders or put into a one touch or magpro if you want to go all out for presentation. This is a great start to a vintage collection! 60's Topps are very affordable in mid to low grades. Yaz cards are super cheap and you should get some more!
__________________
Always looking for rarer Rik Smits cards and cards from the 2014-15 Spectra Global Icons set. Send me a message! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2025
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
That having been said, this is insane money being asked. https://www.ebay.com/itm/15750165751...caAumiEALw_wcB Last edited by Burglekutt; 12-13-2025 at 03:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,693
|
Some of ya are forgetting that if you submit a single card or heck even a few in a single submission to tack on another $40 in shipping fees. And a single “value” submission at the $25 coat is also gonna take what 4 months+ in TAT for PSA.
Part of the equation in “is it worth it?” |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|