![]() |
|
|||||||
| BASEBALL Post your Baseball Cards Hobby Talk |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#126 | ||
|
Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Ok that's about the last of the Q's that I found super interesting |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,983
|
Thanks daeve for the heads up on the list
Interesting that they gave Gunnar the 1 spot above Carroll despite the much higher tools grades for Carroll and a much better scouting report. They said it came down to the defensive position fit in the chat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#129 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 8,335
|
Quote:
This year I rated 126 positional players that had at least 100 PA in full season ball plus ~80 guys or so from the draft.
__________________
Me: Did I win? Gixen: Yes. You won. Now you're broke. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 8,335
|
The guy that seems farthest out of place for me is Merrill. I saw him in the AFL and he seemed pretty ordinary...even for a guy that young. For example, I liked Lawlar and his backup Winn much better. I've got those two at #7 and 8 among position prospects, so likely Top 10 overall depending where the pitchers fall.
On the stats alone Merrill would be clearly outside the Top 100. What I saw in AFL wouldn't change that. Even with the helium he's getting from everyone else dragging him up I still would only have him in the back half of the Top 100.
__________________
Me: Did I win? Gixen: Yes. You won. Now you're broke. |
|
|
|
|
|
#131 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Member
|
Seems like they're underrating Evan Carter for doing everything well, but nothing necessarily plus-plus. That along with perhaps a humble demeanor...
Looks to me like a great baseball player that will simply require time to get on everyone's radar. Kyle Tucker, anyone? Much easier to stand out for the Rangers when he does make it, however. |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,025
|
Just saw Painter with elbow soreness…that’s…not great.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: OH->MI->MD->VA
Posts: 6,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: OH->MI->MD->VA
Posts: 6,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Member
|
Updating my lists for August - not including recent draftees yet. And excluding guys who are up in MLB because they will most likely surpass the rookie eligibility thresholds. If they get demoted and retain eligibility they will join the draftees in my February list.
Top 100 MiLB Prospects, August '23 1. Jackson Chourio 2. Jackson Holliday 3. Ethan Salas 4. Junior Caminero 5. Ricky Tiedemann 6. Termarr Johnson 7. Jackson Merrill 8. Pete Crow-Armstrong 9. Druw Jones 10. Samuel Basallo 11. James Wood 12. Jordan Lawlar 13. Jacob Misiorowski 14. Evan Carter 15. Adael Amador 16. Masyn Winn 17. Tink Hence 18. Colson Montgomery 19. Noelvi Marte 20. Marcelo Mayer 21. Dylan Lesko 22. Kyle Harrison 23. Diego Cartaya 24. Yu-Min Lin 25. Samuel Zavala 26. Cade Horton 27. Jake Eder 28. Kevin Alcantara 29. Jeferson Quero 30. Colt Keith 31. Mick Abel 32. Ben Brown 33. Dalton Rushing 34. Cole Young 35. Brooks Lee 36. Ronny Mauricio 37. David Festa 38. Carson Whisenhunt 39. Noah Schultz 40. Coby Mayo 41. Ty Madden 42. Harry Ford 43. Bryan Ramos 44. Jasson Dominguez 45. Heston Kjerstad Still working on 46-100. Some notes: Ranking pitchers is always tough but seemed tougher than usual. A lot of the top guys are up in MLB, so it does seem a bit lonely at the top... and it feels like it's more projection than usual. As usual my lists are more real-world than fantasy purposes, but they do lean heavily towards 'value', so guys with high ceilings that play + or ++ defensively or project to have high defensive value are typically rated highly. That being said, I go based a lot off what I see visually, so occasionally I like a bat/arm enough that he may be rated highly despite big question marks as to future defensive value. [For pitchers this can mean future RP designations, though they do get knocked if it seems like they are trending towards being RP's. A good example would be someone like Espino, who now due to multiple injuries seems absolutely destined for the pen.] But with the ever-evolving use of Pitchers in MLB now, it seems this is tougher than ever to get a feel for. There's also guys like Spencer Strider who are bucking the "2-pitch=RP" trend and dominating, thus making it feel like an even bigger 'guess' as to who will be able to retain SP workloads. |
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
Member
|
Druw was really tough to rank since he hasn't played. I'm not super high on Lawlar's hit tool compared to others [I tend to agree with Fangraphs' present '35' on it and not sure it gets much higher or any higher barring some dramatic shift] - but from my Feb list, Lawlar did move up 4 spots while Druw moved down 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#141 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,491
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
Member
|
Nothing to gain from 46 PA really... I don't have another guy that's 50-70s tools across the board... aside from Chourio if you really believe in the hit, but even then there's a huge physical difference between the two. Then the next closest you run into is Dyan Jorge - who I have in the next wave [or 5-10 slots].
|
|
|
|
|
|
#144 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 336
|
Nice list Daeve. I'm high on Ethan Salas as well. That kid is the truth.
__________________
Looking for: Jack Hughes FWA PSA 10, Erling Haaland Bundesliga Refractor PSA 10, Tiger Woods 2001 UD BGS 10. |
|
|
|
|
|
#145 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,491
|
Quote:
One thing that stands out here - you kind of question Chourio's hit tool a bit. Chourio is 3 months younger than Druw, and obviously annihilated Low A last year, was solid in Hi A, and this year is performing very well in AA. Interesting to follow how Druw's hit tool isn't in question, but Chourio's is (as it relates to 50-70 grade tools across the board). It's going to be interesting to see how Druw does next year, that is for sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 8,335
|
I like it!
I don't do my list until the season is over, but I've been thinking about the top. I was leaning toward the same Jackson at #1 as you have even before his recent hot streak. The other pure Grade A prospect for me is Caminero. I hadn't really thought much beyond that other than James Wood is not a Grade A at this point. As I think about it now, Salas is probably the 4th Grade A and should come in at #3 or #4 on my list, with a rough projection of $250-$400 for his BCA if it's in Chrome. On Druw Jones, I am docking him for being injured again. You can't glean much from 64 PA (I count his turrible 18 in the ACL as well), but the fact that he's only at 64 PA over a year from being drafted is damning in itself. He'll get docked a whole tier for me, from A- to B+. I had Lawlar at A-/A coming into the year (ie ahead of Druw). He's getting docked too, but not as much as Jones. If it means anything, I got eyes on Druw this year. His defense is not as good as Alek Thomas at a similar stage, although the tools are obvious. Lawlar had (as of last year's AFL) obvious but unrefined tools as well and a chance to be elite at SS, IMO. If Lawlar needed to move to CF, he'd probably have just as much defensive upside as Jones in the OF.
__________________
Me: Did I win? Gixen: Yes. You won. Now you're broke. |
|
|
|
|
|
#147 |
|
Member
|
I'm slashing .352/.426/.604 at Triple-A this season.
I'm way too low on your list.
__________________
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/southernmaryland.sportscards.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
#148 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,818
|
Ain’t no yanquiel
|
|
|
|
|
|
#149 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#150 |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|