Baseball Cards Trimmed by Heroes of Sport Owner Will Jaimet and Sold via PWCC

[3124508 on COMC]

This thread is simply a reference list of baseball cards trimmed by Will Jaimet and sold through PWCC. I urge you to read through the thread linked directly below for a full understanding of Will Jaimet's fraud:

https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1288383



The cards listed here are just the tip of the iceberg. I would strongly advise against anyone buying any modern graded (PSA, BGS, or SGC) cards that were first sold through PWCC. The reason for this will become more and more evident in the coming weeks and months. In addition, in reference to the thread linked above, do not purchase any Heroes of Sport products.


Jaimet's eBay account is qut9, which displays as q***u. He has been selling trimmed cards though PWCC for years and his been trimming cards since at least early 2015.

TRIMMED: 2005 Absolute Memorabilia Tools Of The Trade Babe Ruth PATCH /100 PSA 10
Pre: https://www.worthpoint.com/worthoped...102-1896355954
Post: https://www.pwccmarketplace.com/items/1643411
Feedback: https://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISA...&mPg=12&page=4



TRIMMED: 2009 Elite Extra Edition Mike Trout ROOKIE AUTO 073/495 #57 PSA 10 GEM MINT
Pre: https://www.worthpoint.com/worthoped...ike-1895843479
Post: https://www.pwccmarketplace.com/items/1657746
Feedback: https://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISA...0&mPg=7&page=2



TRIMMED: 2015 Panini Contenders Cracked Ice Aaron Judge ROOKIE RC 07/23 #3 PSA 10
Pre: https://www.worthpoint.com/worthoped...ers-1876732541 https://www.worthpoint.com/worthoped...dge-1874583463
Post: https://www.pwccmarketplace.com/items/1539166
Feedback: https://web.archive.org/web/20190420...mPg=19&page=10



TRIMMED: 2008 UD Sweet Spot Clayton Kershaw ROOKIE RC AUTO 10/50 #133 PSA 10 GEM MT
Pre: https://www.worthpoint.com/worthoped...ngs-1879092015
Post: https://www.pwccmarketplace.com/items/1561497
Feedback: https://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISA...0&mPg=5&page=2


Finally, this card called out as trimmed by Dan is also from Jaimet:

Thread link: https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1267706




Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190403...0&mPg=6&page=4


EDIT:

https://www.worthpoint.com/worthoped...ett-1924989189
https://www.pwccmarketplace.com/items/1692802


https://www.worthpoint.com/worthoped...ure-1923195947
https://www.pwccmarketplace.com/items/1692718

[imbluestreak23]

dis gunna be guud

[ChiSox72]

To me, it is not clear that all of these cards are the same.

The Ruth card is clearly NOT the same card. I can look at it and give you three specific reasons/examples why.

I don't know you or the seller and have no skin in this at all, but the Ruth card is not the same card. The other cards are suspect too.

[boston12]

Originally Posted by ChiSox72

To me, it is not clear that all of these cards are the same.

The Ruth card is clearly NOT the same card. I can look at it and give you three specific reasons/examples why.

I don't know you or the seller and have no skin in this at all, but the Ruth card is not the same card. The other cards are suspect too.

Fully agree on the Ruth. People are outta control on both sides about trimming. Pure paranoia and pure scum bags on the other. Still doesn’t bother me, I suppose it should.

[wlalocal]

Same serial number, and identical stamp on the Ruth.
what are your 3 reasons?

Originally Posted by ChiSox72

To me, it is not clear that all of these cards are the same.

The Ruth card is clearly NOT the same card. I can look at it and give you three specific reasons/examples why.

I don't know you or the seller and have no skin in this at all, but the Ruth card is not the same card. The other cards are suspect too.

[Duvalier]

Originally Posted by ChiSox72

To me, it is not clear that all of these cards are the same.

The Ruth card is clearly NOT the same card. I can look at it and give you three specific reasons/examples why.

I don't know you or the seller and have no skin in this at all, but the Ruth card is not the same card. The other cards are suspect too.

The Kershaw sure doesn't look suspect.

[corndog]

Originally Posted by ChiSox72

To me, it is not clear that all of these cards are the same.

The Ruth card is clearly NOT the same card. I can look at it and give you three specific reasons/examples why.

I don't know you or the seller and have no skin in this at all, but the Ruth card is not the same card. The other cards are suspect too.

The Ruth card is absolutely the same card #087/100.

Click the links.
It's not difficult.

[Tony27]

I dont want to see people NOT make money on cards. I can remember a time in the 80's wanting to open up shop but this is no way to go about it. A lesson to be learned by all imo. Thing is, how deep does this reallllly go?

I have other problems with todays business in the card world but mum is the word right now.

[3124508 on COMC]

Originally Posted by corndog

The Ruth card is absolutely the same card #087/100.

Click the links.
It's not difficult.

Thanks. After spending 8 hours today writing threads, I was hoping that people could at least click the links themselves.

[boston12]

I didn’t realize there were back pictures of the Ruth. Now I see the serial number. Piece of jersey still looked different.

[Bassplayah101]

Originally Posted by 3124508 on COMC

Thanks. After spending 8 hours today writing threads, I was hoping that people could at least click the links themselves.

Thank you for your hard work.


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

[ChiSox72]

Originally Posted by 3124508 on COMC

Thanks. After spending 8 hours today writing threads, I was hoping that people could at least click the links themselves.

We've seen examples of serial numbers being printed multiple times with DLP.

I see three differences on the front of the card.

[Shadowsonic2004]

Originally Posted by Duvalier

The Kershaw sure doesn't look suspect.

He's missing half his shoe in the new one.

[rngrdanny22]

Originally Posted by ChiSox72

We've seen examples of serial numbers being printed multiple times with DLP.

I see three differences on the front of the card.

And those are?

[rebbrooks]

Originally Posted by ChiSox72

We've seen examples of serial numbers being printed multiple times with DLP.

I see three differences on the front of the card.

What are the differences?

[CubKings]

This makes me think the grading companies have to be in on it. To grade a card gem, do they not measure the sh!t at all? So clearly they let it slide for some people.

Another reason to see that grading is an overrated scam.

[dodgerfanjohn]

Why is the patch on the Ruth different?

[rngrdanny22]

The fact that every one of these threads lately has people questioning the work of the OP shows how easy it is to perpetrate this crime.

People, there are clear differences pre and post trimming in every card posted.

Get your eyes checked. Wow.

[Duvalier]

Originally Posted by Shadowsonic2004

He's missing half his shoe in the new one.

Exactly. It's obvious it is trimmed

[rngrdanny22]

Originally Posted by dodgerfanjohn

Why is the patch on the Ruth different?

How is it different? They are identical, but the "pre" picture has a clear sticker on the case causing a slight shadow on the pinstripe.

edit: maybe it's not a sticker, but a light streak from the poor lighting and camera.

[WhacksPacks]

OP, see my reply in the main thread you link in your post.
This can get much bigger if you want it to.

[superdan49]

Originally Posted by ChiSox72

We've seen examples of serial numbers being printed multiple times with DLP.

I see three differences on the front of the card.

Provide evidence of the three differences.

[superdan49]

That last Griffey card that OP linked was a trimmed card I uncovered way back in January. I did not know who consigned it to PWCC just that it was trimmed. PWCC responded by pulling the card and PSA actually de-certified it.

But know we know thanks to OP's investigation that Will Jaimet not only bought the card raw, but it appears trimmed it and consigned it to PWCC as well.

[ThoseBackPages]

OH MY!

[corndog]

Originally Posted by Duvalier

The Kershaw sure doesn't look suspect.

I took new close-ups of the areas shown so that you and others can see where to look and also what to look for when you are viewing other cards. Trimmed cards are easier to spot when the card has image that bleeds off of the card's edge like this one does. Focus onto the toe end of the shoe. On the raw card you will notice that there is black background showing between the white edge of the shoe and the trimmed edge of the card. When you look at the same area of the PSA-10 card the black background is gone. This is solely due to the edge being trimmed thus removing a portion of the printed surface.

Hope this helps.

And FANTASTIC JOB OP!!!