![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Packistan
Posts: 384
|
I can't stand when someone says that they can no longer combine shipping because of the new USPS rates. What? How exactly does the extra dime (the kind of moron who makes his money by gouging on shipping is the same kind of guy who ships in a recycled bubble mailer or white envelope without delivery confirmation) mean that you can't combine shipping on two .99 cards?
If you sell .99 items with $3 for shipping and refuse to combine shipping, fine. You're gouging and circumventing eBay fees, but that's fine. But don't feed me the "USPS fee increases have made it so that I can no longer combine shipping" BS. Anyone who says this crap needs to be stabbed in the eye with a spork and then thrown into a woodchipper feet first. Anyone else have an eBay peeve? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
I agree with you. I usually don't buy from people who don't combine shipping.
I'm more forgiving about the recycled bubble mailers. Landfills don't go away overnight. When I build up too many of the used incoming mailers, I trim them down, secure the cards in them, and then plop the bundle in a new, 6x9 manila envelope(made with recycled paper). It doesn't save time (nor much money), but I think recycling is important. I have had zero complaints, and the cards are secure. Go ahead, let the bashing begin. I can take it.
__________________
Washington Capitals fan ![]() "The lotus flower blooms most beautifully from the deepest and thickest mud"--Buddhist proverb |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
you're absolutely correct Rabbit......... i hate it too.
personally, i think there should be an additional charge for buyers after they win the auction specifically for the seller fees. maybe like a 10% buyers premium......... like at the Barrett Jackson car auctions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 52
|
most of those who do this you should avoid...most of the time i email first just to see if they
1. respond 2. combine shipping this way i can tell upfront if they are a reliable seller |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Packistan
Posts: 384
|
Quote:
As for landfills, they are just fine. Put schools, playgrounds, athletic fields, factories, etc on top of them. Landfills are lined and covered to keep toxic materials from seeping out, so they are safe. I am not anti-recycling per se, but I would never be in favor of recycling when it would be cheaper to throw away and buy new than to recycle. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Packistan
Posts: 384
|
Some reliable sellers don't respond. If someone asks a question before an auction ends, I respond. If they ask when their item shipped after an auction has ended, they aren't getting a response (because it's all in the e-mails they get from PayPal).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Inactive Account
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 11,113
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Packistan
Posts: 384
|
Quote:
I'd let my kid go to school to a school built over a landfill before I'd ever let him go to school in California. People send their kids to school at schools built near fault lines all the time, and there is a hell of a lot more danger of an earthquake (or a mud slide or any number of things) than any kind of ill effect from a SEALED LANDFILL. "Landfill" just sounds bad. There's nothing bad about it. I bet you'd be scared to live next to a nuclear plant too, wouldn't you? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
I have to agree with landfills being fine to be built on. Here in Virginia Beach we have a very popular park called Mount Trashmore. It has jogging trails, picnic areas and a lake. It is actually a very nice park made of a pile of trash and dirt.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|